this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
133 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13998 readers
932 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They're going to do this for gender affirming care next, just watch

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 years ago

I'd be amazed if they haven't already

[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 years ago

My sister has the option of offices to work for in her next rotation. She'd been planning to move back to Houston to live near her family. However, she recently changed her mind, explicitly because - and I quote - "I want to have more children, and I can't do that safely in Texas".

That's the real ultimate consequence of this shit.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The same people think that public transit and walkable city design are literally 1984 because the government will use them to control where you can go.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago

I still firmly stand behind my policy proposal that all rugged individualists be beaten to death with a stick

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

They probably love this

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 years ago

get ready for a 6-3 reinterpretation of the commerce clause, baybee

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

yeonmi-park In North Korea, getting healthcare is illegal, and if you're on a highway but headed in the direction of healthcare, they throw you in jail

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 years ago

mm smell that freedom, thank god we don't ban shit like AUTHORITARIAN CHINA

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 years ago

Once again, I think the CIA should be arming women like the Mujahadeen in the 80s.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 years ago

sick diseased parody land Texas passes new law so stupid it bends spacetime

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago (9 children)

How do you even enforce this law? Like, I know shit like this is selectively applied, but even then, like, this would be so difficult to apply. Unless they're just going to ban pregnant people in general from driving?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

One must imagine this works like the "Are you a terrorist" immigration question in the US where it's just there to punish you more severely after you got caught by whatever nightmare texas law allows someone to collect bounties by kidnapping women from abortion clinics or something

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, it will 100% be used to retroactively punish women, I doubt they set up blockades scanning for pregnant people.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

"Pregnant women may only enter cars when it is driven by a husband or direct male relative."

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

I don’t like this Lathe

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago

Something that was brought up in the meeting I was at last night is that neighbors gonna snitch. You see your neighbor is pregnant, then you see they are no longer pregnant after a long weekend out of town, in other words. Pearl clutching ensues.

Now realistically most people that seek abortions aren't even showing at the time they decide to terminate the pregnancy so yeah the whole fucking thing is stupid.

I'm no anatomy knower but I can see this backfiring on people who suffer from miscarriages after they are showing that they are carrying baby weight though since the panhandle is extremely religious and conservative.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago

They find out who had an abortion and then "build a case" backwards from there. Like slapping using a computer to commit a crime. Like who doesn't use a computer to do basic tasks in society. But it's just a punishment multiplier.

How could it hold up in court who knows, but until that's challenged those people remain in jail.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

Texas women prohibited from leaving the house without a male relative, whether pregnant or not.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago

It's partially a chilling effect thing, partially a threat, and partially the state has very invasive surveillance.

they're just going to ban pregnant people in general from driving?

No. No. Your lathe-of-heaven Lathe access is cut off!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

station officers outside of abortion clinics in neighboring states looking for TX plates and have them phone APBs home

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That still doesn’t prove they used the highway to get there.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

you'd catch them using the highway to get back

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Yeah, it would be so difficult to apply in a fair and reasonable way. Who knows what's next? All suspected uterus-havers on house arrest in case they get pregnant? Shit's bad. They're also building a wall across the entire US-Mexico border. It's not just to keep immigrants out, it's to keep capital's "breeding stock" in trapped in the united states. Bad things are happening and it's going to get worse.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I wouldn't want to have an abortion appointment in the middle of a highway anyway!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

geordi-no back alley abortions

geordi-yes highway abortions

Levity aside, fuck Texas.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago

i know i shouldn't use reddit as a serious heuristic but its easier than turning on cable news for an hour, but lately it seems like all the texas border shit & reproductive rights stuff is all being quietly swept under the rug for house speaker circuses & trump prosecution circuses.

i mean this article isn't even on the front page of the paper that published it. it really feels like there's a concerted redirection from the things the dems are willing to go along with domestically (that their constituents have voted to oppose) to dog-and-pony shows in DC that don't materially change anything

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

I tell ya the lathe emote at phone resolution really looks like Vince Gilligan putting a burger king crown on Will Ferrell

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago

Soon: "Texas bans women from driving within 100 miles of an abortion clinic"

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago

Eventually the GOP justices on the supreme court will issue a "surprising" ruling that somehow makes this sort of clearly unconstitutional stuff legal.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

Oh America, whatever crazy thing will you think up next?

Please don't read that as a rhetorical question asked jovially.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

I can't with this fucking state anymore.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Serious question: what will Texas do once it drives away most of its residents? Will it just become an empty husk like West Virginia?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

The ones who can afford to leave aren't nearly as affected by this as the ones who can't, unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

An extremely enforcible law that I'm sure more abortion friendly states will co operate with.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

It’s trite to compare real life misogyny to The Handmaid’s Tale but what the fuck?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

They're clearly doing this to drain funds from abortion lawyers

[–] Sir_Kevin 1 points 2 years ago

This was voted on by commissioners Terence Kovar, Jason Corley and Jordan Rackler.