this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
44 points (97.8% liked)

Canada

10423 readers
609 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Good.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do your crime in Ottawa, face trial in Ottawa.

This is the way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

This is the way.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Anber argued a potential jury pool could be prejudiced from “the animosity fomented by local politicians and the media; the formal position of the City of Ottawa; the civil (lawsuit);...

Or the thousands of people who were tortured, harassed, intimidated, threatened, put out of work, and forced to deal human shit all over the street and diesel fumes for weeks?

There is a 100% sure way to assure that you don't get an unfair trial for a crime that you committed. Don't commit the fucking crime

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There is a 100% sure way to assure that you don’t get an unfair trial. Don’t commit the fucking crime

Methinks you have not thought this through. There have been a number of wrongful conviction cases seen over the years. They got an unfair trail without ever having committed the fucking crime.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I always forget about the fucking pedants.

I've updated my statement.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I always forget about the fucking pedants.

Stands to reason. Not exactly something to waste time thinking about. I'm surprised that you even bothered to take the time to jog your memory now.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yes, thanks for jogging my memory. I would have just ignored you and let my comment stand but I got to get the dig in about being a pedant so I figured I owed it to you since you were technically right which any pedant will tell you is the best kind of right.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

technically right which any pedant will tell you is the best kind of right.

As a part-time pedant (is there a thing?) I think I love this statement; even if I hate myself for doing so.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

One of my favourite jokes for pedants.

What's blue, hangs on the wall, and whistles?

Pedant: I don't know, what's blue, hangs on the wall, and whistles?

A herring.

Pedant: But a herring isn't blue.

So you paint blue.

Pedant: But a herring doesn't hang on the wall!

So you nail it to the wall.

Pedant: BUT A HERRING DOESN'T WHISTLE!!!

So a herring doesn't whistle. It's a joke!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

you were technically right which any pedant will tell you is the best kind of right.

Nah. The best kind of right is when you are wrong. That way you can learn something new.

If I'm being honest, I was hoping you would poke holes in what I said. I guess I need to challenge myself more next time. But thanks for the chat either way!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In my experience you're not interested in a conversation, just making circular, pedantic, bad faith arguments. I'm not interested in that kind of conversation.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

just making circular, pedantic, bad faith arguments.

How else are you going to validate that something is true? You have to push a bunch of ridiculous falsehoods and if they all fall down then you can, with reasonable confidence, know that the truth has presented itself.

Occasionally, what originally seems ridiculous actually holds water, and at that point you know something is suspect with what is presented as being true. This is why validation is necessary. Otherwise you're going to start believing a bunch of things that aren't true, and that would be silly.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why would this be any different than any other crime? Yes, there is generally a preference for trying cases in the community in which the offense occurred, but this wouldn't be the first time that a trial was moved somewhere else in order to improve the chances of an impartial judgement.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The answers you seek are in the article, and the ruling.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm well aware. I was responding to what seems to be your opinion that justice is always best served by keeping the trial in the community in which the offense occurred.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think you should be able to go to Singapore and commit drug crimes then expect to be tried in Canada and I don't think you should be able to come to Ottawa and torture, harass, threaten, intimidate, and put out of work tens of thousands of citizens then expect to be tried somewhere else.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Singapore is nonsensical, because that's a completely different jurisdiction.

For Ottawa-specific laws, there is probably no real choice but to stay in Ottawa. For provincial and federal laws, there are options. I don't necessarily agree that change of venue should be a given, but it is a commonly accepted means of trying to ensure impartiality. I'm not sure that there is anywhere in Canada where this trial could be conducted without the spectre of bias, but, whether we like it or not, change of venue is one of the tools available.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

change of venue is one of the tools available.

And it was denied. And I'm good with that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

So am I 😉

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Good luck with that. The Crown is already fumbling the Tamara Lich trial