this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
751 points (98.3% liked)

World News

49585 readers
2077 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No detectable amount of tritium has been found in fish samples taken from waters near the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant, where the discharge of treated radioactive water into the sea began a month ago, the government said Monday.

Tritium was not detected in the latest sample of two olive flounders caught Sunday, the Fisheries Agency said on its website. The agency has provided almost daily updates since the start of the water release, in a bid to dispel harmful rumors both domestically and internationally about its environmental impact.

The results of the first collected samples were published Aug. 9, before the discharge of treated water from the complex commenced on Aug. 24. The water had been used to cool melted nuclear fuel at the plant but has undergone a treatment process that removes most radionuclides except tritium.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 80 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I remember commenting on a post where China condemned Japan for doing this.

I asked ppl there "is this actually bad or is this kind of par for the course of getting rid of the dangers left behind in Fukushima?" And most of them were like "it's not a common occurrence but it's not inherently dangerous and it's not that big of a deal"

To me it looks like the vast majority of objections to this came from strategic propaganda related to domestic relations of China and/or other nations.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 years ago

they did however find an absolute fuck tonne of microplastics.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago

The power of the sun..... in the palm of my hand

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Precious spaceship fuel

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago

Probably because the octopuses used it all for their science experiments. It's a scientific fact that octopuses hoard tritium. Source: Spider-man 2.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

in other news water is wet

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

Fantastic news! so many people are so afraid of the word "nuclear", and don't understand how large of a volume the ocean is. the lethal dose of Fentanyl is like the size of a grain of rice. Put all of the known legal and illegal volume of fentanyl into the ocean and it would be undetectable.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Dangit, now how am I gonna get my piscine superpowers/fish shaped tumors?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lol, I read that as swimming pool

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Found the fellow Romand (French-speaking Swiss for the rest of the World).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well I'm sorry to say that I'm a Schpuntz but at least I know what a "piscine" is :D

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Nobody's perfect ^/s^

[–] ArmokGoB 11 points 2 years ago

The ocean is 1.335 × 10^21 litres. That number is stupid big. There are 7.5 × 10^18 grains of sand on Earth. If every person in Japan flushed a litre of the reactor water down their toilet, it would be diluted to nothing in no time at all.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Sample size: 64

Also, are there other things like Caesium-137 that pose a risk?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not really. This video by Kyle Hill does an amazing job at explaining it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

This video by Kyle Hill

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

Cs-137 and other fission and activation products can be largely removed by treatment. H-3 is a bit trickier since it literally is part of the water. Luckily it's a fairly weak beta emitter with a relatively short half life so causes very, very little long term harm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

People have been far more concerned about the efficacy of the ALPS system at extracting other contaminants than they are about tritium contamination. The ALPS system is unproven and the wastewater they're releasing would be pretty toxic as far as other radioactive isotopes is concerned if the ALPS system isn't doing it's job perfectly.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

I like this but would rather see a multi country coordinated oceanic study. We're all in this together.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

ignorance and paranoia about radioactivity go hand in hand.

i know so many otherwise smart people who lose it on this issue. because they just think any radioactivity = destroy planet forever . completely ignorant to how it actually works, and just think every power plant must eventually chernobyl and that one barrel of nuclear waste is enough to destroy 1000s of miles or something equally absurd.

totally sad.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Two questions: If it's only tritrium why does anyone really care? Why couldn't they just sell it rather than dump it?

I thi k I just realised those questions both have the same answer...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Welcome back to Fact or Cap

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I for one would like to try this "nuclear fish"......preferably crumbed, deep fried and doused in lemon juice. With a serve of fries.

load more comments
view more: next ›