this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
401 points (97.4% liked)

News

30525 readers
3954 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

Question : didn't the supreme court just say that lower level judges can't block him? Which would mean that appeal judges can? So this question is far from settled?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Moron is literally BEGGING

[–] [email protected] 50 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

If you end birthright citizenship, then nobody gets to be a citizen by birth. If you can't be a citizen by birth, the only way to become a citizen is naturalization. If the only citizens are naturalized people, the country is 100% immigrants.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 57 minutes ago* (last edited 56 minutes ago)

It's just the title, it even says in the article he would move forward with trying to redefine the 14th amendment. Basically it'll be if your parents are citizens, and your born here, you'll be a citizen. (My best guess)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If the only citizens are naturalized people, the country is 100% immigrants.

What do they think America is founded on?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

A mix of first generation immigrants, 2nd generation, 3rd generation, 4th generation, a few remaining natives.

100% first generation immigrants would be a major shift.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And if immigrants don’t need due process and can be sent to concentration camps then it’s really easy to make anyone disappear

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

If immigrants don't get due process, then nobody gets due process.

You could arrest Bill Clinton and claim he's an immigrant. If that means he doesn't get due process, he can never prove he's not an immigrant, and so he's stuck in Guantanamo forever.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Boston witch hunt all over again.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

That's pretty much the plan imo

[–] guyoverthere123 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So... He's goin to deport Baron Trump then, right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I'm all for deporting all of the Trumps, but technically he has citizenship because of his terrible father, regardless of birth location or his mother's citizenship status.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

Where in the Constitution do we spell out that citizenship is granted to a child on the basis of the status of the father, regardless of birth location or their mother's status?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago

No we should deport the Trumps. I'm sure we can find some minor error or omission in his father's old citizenship application. Do what they're doing - go back up the family tree, declare their ancestor's citizenship fraudulent, and deport their whole rotten family tree.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

On unrelated news, what would happen if people stopped paying federal taxes?

I.e., if all of california, or blue states in general, stopped paying federal taxes simultaneously, what would realistically be the outcome?

How would it affect the US? How would it affect the states?

And: Is there a proper place to discuss ideas such as this one?


My (very rough) understanding is that people pay income taxes to the federal tax agency directly. From there, the central US government sends parts of it back to the states, to do things with it such as public services.

Blue states are more economically heavy than red states. They pay in more than they get out. If they stop paying taxes, the US suffers but they get to keep a larger share to themselves? My understanding is very rough, it's just a rough idea.

It could weaken Trump's government?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago

To get a meaningful amount of people to withhold their taxes from the Fed you'd probably need to get enough people working and acting together that you'd already have been able to elect progressive politicians to begin with.

Last time shit got real bad economically we had general strikes, the building of unions, trust and monopoly regulation, etc.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

He is much closer to his stated goal

The power to deport any natural Born Citizen on demand for no reason at all

He has stated he wants.... Needs this

On Exactly why he has been vague

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 hours ago

That means him first motherfucker because Trump is a birthright citizen. His grandfather was an immigrant.

Not like me is like 12 generations removed but still immigrant. Except on my mother's side that native American. But guess Trump will deport them too, because if you got technical they also are immigrants.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (7 children)

Wait ... Doesn't "citizenship" mean where you're born?

It's either where you're born or where you live. Which is it?

Wtf even is citizenship then?

"I'm from Ireland" is synonymous with "I'm Irish"... Right?

So if you're born in America, wouldn't you... Be American?

If he takes that away, you aren't just magically from nowhere, you're still American.

This is stupid and makes no sense, it's all just classism and racism. I hate everything.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 hours ago

You've just given it ten times more thought than the Trump team has.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Doesn’t “citizenship” mean where you’re born?

Only in the new world continents. In Africa, Europe, and Asia it normally means what country your parents and grandparents are from, unless someone in the chain naturalises to a different country.

[–] mic_check_one_two 6 points 8 hours ago

Yup, and when you don’t have any citizenship, you’re stateless. It causes a lot of issues internationally, because a stateless person can’t have a passport, can’t immigrate, can’t hold a legal job because they can’t get a work visa without a passport, etc… Notably, the US is one of the few countries that refused to sign on with the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness. Basically, the convention would prevent a country from revoking someone’s citizenship if they don’t have a valid claim elsewhere. And the US refused to sign.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

Its the same as the election between Obama and McCain, in ways a lot of people dont realize.

Obama, by virtue of having a non-traditional name and not being white, was hounded by birthers despite being born an American citizen clear as day with absolutely no question about it.

McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone the year before people born in the canal zone were granted citizenship at birth. Arguably he was not a citizen at birth under the definitional requirements of the constitution to be president. He was naturalized as a citizen retroactively.

Palin is part native, and was pretty heavily involved with Alaska Native movements that rejected US sovereignty and thereby rejected claims to citizenship. But no one talked about that either because shes also largely seen as just being a white American.

And yet Obama, who was American thru and thru from birth without question, never was involved with Hawaiian sovereignty movements, is the one whos citizenship was questioned.

“White makes right” is the rule of law to these people

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 hours ago

Ted Cruz ran in the Republican presidential primary despite being an Albertan

[–] [email protected] 20 points 14 hours ago

Sounds about white.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›