this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
360 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

71537 readers
4185 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 39 minutes ago

So glad I never did this one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

All your DNA just got bought.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

TTAM later said it had obtained backing from a “Fortune 500 company with a current market capitalization of more than $400 billion and $17 billion of cash on hand.”

That's not at all concerning.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

A little searching finds only one company that really fits the bill. Costco has a market cap of $433B and had a reported $14.8B cash on hand as of May 11. That's an interesting possibility that I wouldn't have guessed. Costco is less evil than most big corporations, so that's a little hopeful if I got it right.

Oracle comes close with a market cap of $583B. That's indeed over $400B, but that would make the description a bit weird. In any case, Oracle makes more sense from a business angle. Unfortunately, they are near the top of the evil scale.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Calling it here, Costco is going to use the genetic information to create the perfect hot dog.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 minutes ago

Membership is going to be linked to your DNA, the register will prick your finger to make sure you're valid.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Soylent dogs

[–] lka1988 4 points 1 hour ago

Costco already creates the perfect hotdog.

I say they should invest in bringing back the Polish dog. That was fucking delicious.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 hours ago

Shit, Oracle was down in the low $400B range in May. Apparently being evil pays well in the current administration.

[–] nutsack 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

how the fuck did this company go bankrupt what did i miss

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 hours ago

It's not a great business model if you think about it. Customers pay a small fee once then never again.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How about the data they sold

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 hours ago

That's exactly where all the value is. Selling people's fucking genetic information. What makes it even more valuable is that it can be used against all subsequent descendants of the person that willingly gave it up. Do a DNA test like this and you're selling out your entire family.

[–] [email protected] 212 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Start company.

Run it into the ground.

Go bankrupt.

Buy it back.

📈

[–] [email protected] 115 points 1 day ago

Debts are gone might as well

[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In the capitalist system, the investors deserve all the profits because they're the ones risking everything, or something like this, I'm not an economists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Bondholders are having a haircut.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

Yes, and the workers risk nothing, or something like that, I'm told. 😂

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

I’m pretty sure the users risked a lot too for this one

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You missed 2. Sell (IPO)company

I’m not sure what ~~he~~ she actually did as far as divestiture, but evidently he wasn’t the current owner. I wonder to what degree unreasonable growth expectations flushed the company.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OP, you linked to the comments instead of the top of the article. 💀

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah dang you did point it out. They even just copied the top comment there, unless they are ColdWetDog.

[–] lka1988 1 points 1 hour ago

At least they quoted it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Debts are gone AND now he can sell the user data with impunity! No NO, that was that OTHER GUY

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

heh fair, gender bias for me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

Hey, don't talk about Guy Incognito like that

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

This roller coaster keeps on rollering

[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Actually an interesting turn of events. Sounds like she'd been fighting hard to get it back, but they'd been fighting her on it.

Not sure what it all means, but there's something going on there. It's all very unusual.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

Selling off user data but has an excuse to "wasn't me" the whole situation

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

There's still some gift left to squeeze out. She's not giving up on a good bad thing.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought they had already agreed the sale of the genetic data to another company?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

There's an article in the link.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Ok so I think I'm the first person in the comments to actually click to read the article, cause I'm gonna say something I'm not seeing.

How did you get it to auto snap to the article comment section?
Didnt realize you could share that and it wouldn't default to the article.

[–] lka1988 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Some webpages have a bad habit of automatically appending tags to the URL, or outright changing it, as you scroll down.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Everything after the # character in the URL is called an anchor and it's not actually being sent to the website server so it's meant for your browser (though the server can see it using javascript). The anchor can point to any ID in the HTML of the web page and browser will scroll it into view on page load. You can find the ID of any element using right click -> inspect though not all elements have explicit ids.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The "#comment" at the end of the URL. It's a title/heading/fragment in HTML that hints to your browser to go there directly.

Like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL#fragment

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh. Neat.

Thanks for the Wikipedia link

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I've no idea to be honest.

load more comments
view more: next ›