this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
233 points (93.3% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

7427 readers
631 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alk@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Since people in New Jersey aren't allowed to pump their own gas, they should also have to call someone to drive to their house and plug in their electric vehicle for them every time they have to charge.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It would make a similar amount of sense.

[–] DeceasedPassenger@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Ava@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oregon legalized self-service a couple years ago, though stations still have to have attendant service too.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Just in case an old person who can't pump their own gas shows up

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

Only some counties in Oregon. Everywhere in NJ

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I have never understood why so many people have an issue with an obvious jobs program.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Broken window fallacy

Destroying people's ability to pump their gas then "fixing" it with a job program.

Might as well let people pump their gas and then give the "workers" money and time. Consumers would pay the same and the "workers" still get the same money but extra time to hopefully better themselves rather than being stuck pumping gas for 8 hours a day.

"Creating jobs" only works when the jobs are needed for the society.

Creating a job just to justify paying someone is absurd.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Perfection is the enemy of good fallacy.

We aren’t getting rid of gas stations or capitalism anytime soon, this is something that we can do right now.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Let's say the gas station worker makes $15 an hour

Let's say gas is $3 per gallon

That means if the gas station worker wasn't there the gas station could give away 5 gallons of gas for free per hour and still make the same profit.

Which is better for the whole society? One person making $15 an hour doing a task that 49 other states have no problem doing themselves. Or 1 person from the community getting 5 free gallons of gas every hour?

If you never stop paying that person $15 an hour, you can never move on to better things.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

And efficiency. If you spend time in the south, people park at the pump and then just wander off. Scratch off some lottery tickets. Get a soda. Use the bathroom. Write a sonnet. All sorts of shit.

Do that in NJ and traffic would back up onto the parkway and down ten exits.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

And every transaction on the one open register: Lemme get uhhhhhhhhh two number twelves… uhhhhhhhhhhhhh a quick pick… uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh two rolls of the Kodiak long cut… uhhhhhhhhhhhh

[–] JollyBrancher@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

And we can add in what feels like half the gas stations I go to in Eastern PA. Especially now that more people are being forced to commute again.