Why should artists be responsible for a shitty business plan of someone else? Especially if it ends up being monetarised by this specific someone and is not going to be public domain?
BrainWorms
Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.
This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness
And good fucking riddance.
That's a sacrifice I am willing to make.
In which case it is clearly industrialized piracy-at-scale and should be handled in the same way.
It's funny how piracy is the worst thing ever. Till they do it
Oh no! Anyway...
Give him his full title, "meta shareholder Nick Clegg".
Good.
This is how I feel about not paying rent to kill the landlord industry.
As the representative from the plagiarism industry I'm very upset that we now have to ask the permission or copyright holders to copy their work.
Why does he think that peasant care if this shiti industry exists?
And the man is not at all worried about hurting or killing the career of artists along the way.
That's what robbers say as well. "yeah if we ask everyone if we can take their stuff it would kill our industry."
Then perish.
I sure fucking hope it does
Where would we get our daily fix of uncanny valley photos without AI?