There's one source of fascism and oppression in Turkey and it's sure as hell not LGBT people, dawg.
this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
109 points (99.1% liked)
World News
330 readers
422 users here now
Please help and contribute as we vote on rules:
https://quokk.au/post/21590
Other Great Communities:
Rules
Be excellent to each other
founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
Provide social services so having a child isn't cost prohibitive and more people will have children.
Yuck, this one's tainted with rational thought and good will!
Idiots in power seem to frequently have a complete inabilty to understand societal changes...
They understand very well, they just want people to believe others are to blame.
I don't think they actually care. It's all for show to get votes. Whether the country has children or not doesn't actually matter to them. They won't have to live with the decisions. They'll have the money to pay for elderly care.
He's talking about people no longer being muslim. Because muslim men can marry 4 wives, and produce children 4x as fast as one-man one-woman marriages.
It's a technique from thousands of years ago, that still is used by religions. Outbreed your enemy. Turn the women into slaves, and in 20 years, you have 4x the population as your enemy - so now, it's time for war. And war is used to capture more women, etc...
All religions are conservative, and when conservatives try to get more power, they appeal to their conservative religions with conservative religious bullshit.
No other religion is better than the one I'm talking about. They all pull this 'global domination through assholeishness" bullshit.
I guess theoretically LGBT fascism could exist in some alternative timeline. I'm trying to imagine it. The uniforms would be wild.
Politicians and their voters in low birth-rate countries will blame everything and anything but the real issues. If you have to stay at work all day to pay for a small shitty appartment, have little to no disposable income on top of that, and are staring down the barrel of a new world war + the end of livable climates for humans, having multiple babies is not very high on the list of future plans.
But sure. Blame the queers that make up what... 5% of the population?
I'm sure blaming unrelated people and things will magic more babies into existence /s
Try giving people the means to live a dignified life, with proper housing and food security, and wait a while.
The population won't boom but people will be more at ease to consider having children.
Most even want to have children. Unfortunately, they can't because they have a consciousness.
We have that in the Nordics, yet our birth rates are also falling.
I'm thinking the chants about the planet dying and the children not having a future might have some relevance.
That's doomerism.
it's pragmatism.
Opinions vary.
My parents faced the same doubts, as their parents did and so on. As I did.
Our problems are not new. We are not special or unique.
I doubt your parents were concerned about climate change, microplastics, and the fact that a kid born today will barely be in their 20's when ocean life collapses. you can think none of this is special if you really want to, if nothing else these conditions are just exponentially worse.
Thank you for that excellent example. No, ocean life won't collapse in 20 years. This is not a "climate denier" statement - it's the current actual state of science.
There are however a lot of "doomist" headlines spread by activists and activist media that exaggerate - a lot - and that's indeed part of why I think young people hesitate in starting families.
(I'm of the generation that grew up thinking we'd all die due to nuclear armaggedon)
Global conflicts, famines, droughts, authoritarian governments, desertification, high unemployment, low salaries...
Our problems are not unique. Every single generation had their own version of the same life problems.
I respect your position but I do not subscribe it.
There's a population crisis because people stopped fucking and making babies cold türkyie.
Not surprising - traditionalist liberals attacking LGBT people because they dare defy the holy family structure is very common.
I doubt this has anything to do with religion though, apart from it being used as a convenient tool to add credence to the rhetoric. More people being born and raised via unpaid labor of their parents (usually mothers) means more future workers for the ruling class to extract labor value from, which usually means more economic growth and more bodies for when war breaks out.
Yeah, well he's an idiot and always has been