this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
790 points (98.8% liked)

Funny

10704 readers
760 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 127 points 2 months ago (18 children)

We make logging companies "replant forests" (yes it's not at all the same as the old growth but it's something). Why do we let mining companies completely rape the land and replace nothing? It doesn't even look like they backfill with the unused debris, much less restore topsoil or plant anything.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Here in the UK I know of lots of old mines and quarries that, because the ground is inherently unstable once the mining has finished, the land gets reclaimed as a nature reserve. Think nice walks, wildflowers, native trees, marshlands etc. A lot of effort goes into making habitats for insects, birds and animals.

Whether or not it is all paid for by the mining companies, I don't know.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago

It isn't. I guarantee it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's how we do it here in the US if they're operating near an urban area. My understanding is that they are required by law to do that in exchange for the permits or something.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Only if the city cares. I'm in a capital city where strip mining occurs within city limits, and they just leave acid pools behind because the thick forests keep people from noticing it

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Underground mining and strip mining are very different in the possibilities to recover.

Both underground mining and strip mining will devastate natural and urban areas in Germany for centuries. For the former black coal and iron mining areas they basically have no solution except to keep the pumps running indefinitely as the flooded underground mines would collapse, causing sinkholes and eating the houses on top. For the strip mining, these will be scars on the earth until geology has taken care of it in a few million years.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Well, not 100% on this, but maybe because we're an overaged society that elects corrupt politicians rather than accept that change in lifestyle is necessary? Or maybe it is the brainwashing of the Springer-press that continues to vilify the Greens. Maybe a mix of both.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

They do backfill, but they obviously lose quite a bit of volume in the process, so they cannot completely fill the hole. The remaining part is usually flooded.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Where I live they are required to rehabilitate the land afterwards, but usually that's after the mine has been running for like 30+ years and by the time they shut down, they do some weird financial trickery and declare bankruptcy despite having made millions in profits the previous decades and then they just walk away and tax payers need to clean up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It will be turned into a giant lake once they are done mining. You burn a lot of volume and filling it wil soil again is just not possible

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Except they actually do backfill it and plant trees; it's still an ecological horror though

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Why do we let mining companies completely rape the land and replace nothing?

The government spend billions to brainwash people and turn them complicit. Check out the "germany rearming" threads to see how even on lemmy plenty of people are happy with the raping.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 93 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Bagger 288 is there to safeguard all mankind.

The Bagger 288 wreaks total utter devastation.

The Bagger 288 contains an artificial mind.

This mind is full of hatred, violence is its sole vocation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

He is not here to save mankind - he is here to avenge it!

[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Being destroyed by a giant machine is terrible but it did file the proper paperwork first so what can be done at this point?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

Just enjoy the hyperspace bypass, I expect.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

There’s a lot to be said about dotted eyes and crossed teas.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

I hate so much how accurate this is as a metaphor for how many politicians deal with the fascist AfD.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 months ago

Uhm no bagger-288 was created to protect mankind from godzillas and doom robots from the future.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 months ago

ok I hate coal and fossil fuels, but this thing is so cool

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Alternatively, build a flying machine with TNT duplicators

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

[ilmango intro music] 🥭🥭🥭

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (10 children)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Those photos are from planes.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Probably, but the entire idea of "you can see it from space" is stupid anyways. Its only meaningful if its with the naked eye and the distance is specified. You can see anything from space if you have enough optical zoom...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

You can see anything from space if you have enough optical zoom...

Naw, there's theoretical a maximum resolution, iirc it's a few centimeters. Too much air in the way diffracting the light

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

You can see people's backyard trampolines.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago

This is very real and has been an issue for years. I remember when I was younger, watching public TV, and I saw a news report about an elderly lady who was forced to sell her home along with the rest of her village so that they could dig up the entire area for coal. At the time it was a big deal, because she took so long to agree, which got media attention. It was incredibly depressing. It felt dystopian.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It is an engineering marvel, indeed, as it is the biggest mobile machine of the world.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Ahh, you just beat me to it!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago

every rational part of my brain fighting the 7 year old me inside me who knows Bagger 288 is the coolest thing ever

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

Looks like a Final Fantasy optional boss.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

It's a man-made Langolier.... slowly eating a dying world no one wants.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Funny and sad

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

I love how I know the name Bagger 288 because of a 16 year old meme

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Removed from the environment.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

Why remove something from the environment when you can just remove the environment

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Just as well. 'tis a silly place.

load more comments
view more: next ›