this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
129 points (100.0% liked)

Raygun Gothic

405 readers
1 users here now

We’ve moved to piefed.social now. Come visit us there!

https://piefed.social/c/raygungothic


Also worth checking out:

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

It's the family wagon everyone can enjoy.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You could commit mass murder at 1 mph with that front bumper - or lack thereof.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It looks like it will loose traction an flop off the road.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

How else you design a flying car?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It looks aerodynamic but I bet it probably really isn't. Fast-looking things are rarely as fast as they look.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Looking fast applies to supersonic speeds. Drag physics are kind of backwards at speeds higher than the speed of sound. For subsonic a round front with a pointy back is more aerodynamic. Like a snowcone.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Kinda yes kinda no.
The front, yes. But a long sloping back causes drag because the air stays attached to the surface. You want the air to detach from the surface when you're not using it to reduce drag.

But also aerodynamics are very complicated so blanket statements are usually not super accurate.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Dis right here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Detaching and becoming turbulent actually causes more drag because the boundary layer shrinks causing low speed air to be closer to the surface. Fluids are super non intuitive or i might be misunderstanding your meaning of detached. Dimensionless parameters make it even more non intuitive.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

it's streamlined but the aerodynamics of it are poorly thought out; this is going to act like a wing plane - lifting the front end and reducing traction authority.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

It's funny that space stuff doesn't need to be aerodynamic, and most cars back then were just a couple squarish blocks put together

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

It's funny to think that under that body is a really rudimentary chassis and some very basic parts. You'd feel unsafe just looking it what's meant to stop you, what's meant to steer you, and what's meant to help in a crash—or bare lack of.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It’s neat but I wonder how it performs on crash tests.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

slices right through those annoying pedestrians.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

you want a moose hardened car you go with volvo. they literally designed their cars around moose impact survivability.

this thing does not look like a volvo. it's gonna slice the poor stiltcow's legs at the knee and send the bastard right into the driver's seat, then the rear seats, then out the back.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Pedestrian safety means a clean chop through the femur.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

That is one huge hood.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Fuckin s e x y

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Musk: what if we took something cool from 60 years ago and made it totally fucking retarded?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I see problems of traction with the steering wheel.