this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
81 points (93.5% liked)

Linguistics Humor

1496 readers
1 users here now

Do you like languages and linguistics ? Here is for having fun about it


For serious linguistics content: [email protected]


Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

There would be two wuggum!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

You don't pull the lever to only kill one wug.

I don't pull the lever to avoid having to form the plural of wug.

We are not the same.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

No there wouldn't, they'd be dead.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Wugwugennen!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Wugs. There, I said it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If a trolley is heading towards two wugs and there is a lever to switch it to another track with just one wug, but no one is present, does the trolley make a sound as it runs the two wugs over?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Yes, but my proof is too large to fit in the margins.

[–] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling 3 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

smudged wug.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago