this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
75 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23870 readers
230 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

China is the dream; they're like one of the few countries and only super power that's actually working towards the betterment of humanity

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

China: Trying to make the world a better place.

America: Trying to monetize the rot.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

God China is winning so much right now

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

没有共产党,就没有新中国

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Without the Communist Party, there would have been no New China

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Thank you!!! I love that song!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

This reminds me, the Korean version of this song goes so hard https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lD5pAHYEC6Q

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

hey i actually read this!

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

headlines that could be very different with a single letter change

volcel-kamala

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

American science just can't compare baby-matt

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was thinking "artificial son"

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Fuck yeah

Do we have to call it an "artificial sun"? Because that's... weirdly sinister. And "tokamak" or "plasma reactor" sound badass already.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

tokamak = hotboxing your car in the McDonald's drive thru line

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

Tokamak is a Soviet word USSR fidel-salute-big

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

Do we have to call it an "artificial sun"? Because that's... weirdly sinister.

nah that sounds cool too

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wow we need to nuke china RIGHT NOW and destroy this.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

The sinister chinese are causing global warming by creating a second sun, don't they know it's dang hot enough!!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Technically they're already nuking themselves by building this.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Artificial sin kelly

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I achieved a discharge this morning to zero fan-fare

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looking at the stark difference between contemporary Chinese and American science, it’s basically insane to think America not even that long ago was the scientific center of the world.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MIT is working on a similar reactor design with some private firm, not as far progressed

Detailed study of magnets built by MIT and Commonwealth Fusion Systems confirms they meet requirements for an economic, compact fusion power plant.

https://news.mit.edu/2024/tests-show-high-temperature-superconducting-magnets-fusion-ready-0304

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Yes but it should be renamed BMIT.

The Bitch Made Institute of Technology

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Meanwhile in American science news

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Highest amount of bullshit I've ever read, American scientists can be such jokes sometimes.

It all went downhill when we started accepting "celebrity scientists"

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The article doesn't say what the Q value is. I'm assuming it's below 1.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'd imagine, but I found this interesting:

Currently the maximum Q value achieved by humans is 1.53.

Had no idea someone had managed to get more energy out of a fusion device than they put in. Must have been unable to sustain it for any significant length of time, but still seems important.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

The Q=1.53 was done at the National Ignition Facility using inertial confinement fusion, which is significant for plasma research (and probably bombs), but can't be used to generate power.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

It was big news I want to say about a year ago when a team first published that they had done it

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Also this is just plasma gain, not whole system gain. To have a commercially viable reactor your probably need Q total > 10 at least. No system build so far even has a Q total of 1

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It was the NIF two years ago but it's also not going to be generating power ever, it was just a demonstration/proof of concept.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, and cold fusion is 10 years away. They are not going to manage that in 5 years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you think that? The use of higher temperature superconductors is stated to significantly reduce size and construction time so you don't have to wait 30 years for ITER.

Q>10 is one thing, being able to sustain that for useful periods, cheap fuel, accessible tritium) radioactive waste and not having to rebuild the reactor every few years are far more difficult problems.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If estimates on fusion were reliable we would have had cold fusion in 1970. They can move faster but there are so many unknown unknowns.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Right, but they weren't building these sort of functioning scaled down demonstrators in the 70s

Is there even a theoretical model that suggests cold fusion could occur?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I hope they can do it, but I will eat a shoe and post it to this website if they hit Q>10 by 2027