this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
30 points (94.1% liked)

Television

5248 readers
1 users here now

Redirected - Please see [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

TL;DR: 301 of the top 400 cable TV shows (for a random week in July) aired on one of these four networks: ESPN, Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sports and news, not at all shocking. The only things that aren't worth watching after the fact.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sports and entertainment. None of those are news imo

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Call it whatever you want, it doesn’t affect my point. Not much value in watching something CNN aired 3 days ago, right?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No value in watching something CNN is airing in 3 minutes. It's all trash made to control Americans

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

OK we get it, TV news is trash. I'm not really talking about the quality of it, I'm just explaining why it's still one of the few things keeping old-school cable going. If you're the kind of person who watches TV news, you watch it that day. No one's going back in time and watching every single episode of Tucker Carlson or Rachel Maddow just for kicks.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If the majority of cable channels were owned by someone other than the same conglomerates that own streaming networks and broadcast channels — would there be better programming on cable?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

No, I genuinely don't think that would matter. The quality of what's on TV is dictated by the customer. Execs will air whatever as long as it brings in viewers and ad revenue. They'd air a 24-hour special on paint drying if it could pull in enough eyeballs.