this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
132 points (97.1% liked)

politics

24190 readers
3049 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's called soliciting bribes. And really really damaging to have our government run in this kind of transactional impact.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Testing the boundaries?! No, he is blatantly violating corruption laws. He is asking for a quid pro quo, you do this for me and I'll do that for you.

John Roberts, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the USA defined corruption as "a contribution to a particular candidate in exchange for his agreeing to do a particular act within his official duties."

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

And the corporatocracy will ensure he "wins" the election with thunderous applause.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

He can walk that back, precedent schmecedent

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

He's not testing the boundaries of the law. He's testing the level of enforcement.

Time and again he shows he's willing to break the rules 10 times to the point where a judge starts threatening him with jail time, then he considers not doing it and whines about how he can't do that instead.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here's what's going to happen:

  1. Trump will come right out and say on camera that these are quid pro quo deals
  2. The media will say this will finally be the thing that gets him put in prison
  3. Trump will be acquitted.
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's got to be charged with something in order to be acquitted. That won't even happen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And when it doesn't the media will just say "I guess that's a non-story after all" and let it go.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

By firing a round into his head the perp tested the boundaries of homicide.