this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
546 points (99.5% liked)

Not The Onion

16857 readers
2108 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 208 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Any company that intentionally underpays their employees so that they require govt assistance to live should be billed the full cost of all assistance that employee receives.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think that minimum wage being a livable salary, is less complicated.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

I imagine that's part of their point? At least that is how I took it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

UBI could be even less complicated. If everyone were guaranteed a livable income, a minimum wage might not even be necessary.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I like Scott Galloway's take: SPEAK THEIR LANGUAGE!

Call UBI a negative tax and Republican voters will listen.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Just enough to pay rent and utilities. Then only corporations will own property.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago

Billed double. Make it hurt.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

*should be nationalized and sold off, and its mismanagers prosecuted

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

The wealthy NEED the airports to keep running so not to interfere with their vacation plan. Starving kids on the other hand can simply be rewoven as doormats by any good capitalist.

[–] [email protected] 152 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm GLAD we not only BAILED THESE COMPANIES OUT WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS and also DON'T TAX THEM but we ALSO get to Pay Their Employees!

-Republicans who don't want to use their Tax Dollars to Feed Starving American Children.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Why would we feed starving children when they're just going to grow up being underpaid employees on welfare?!

[–] [email protected] 134 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How is being paid "from pushback to arrival" even vaguely legal?

[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When you have money you get to write the laws.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago

Even fast food restaraunts in airports pay a higher hourly rate to compensate the staff for the added pain in the balls for getting to work.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they're salaried? only thing I can come up with.

If they're infact hourly... then work is work, and they're working off the clock.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They're hourly. I still can't believe this is legal.

Edit: found an article on it. Spoiler: it's legal because the government makes all sorts of exceptions for airlines. Their unions even have to get government permission to strike!

https://www.opb.org/article/2024/02/12/flight-attendants-don-t-earn-their-hourly-pay-until-aircraft-doors-close-here-s-why/

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Thank you Railway Labor Act of 1926. It's actually not all bad, but it does put railway and airline workers in a different class. It all depends on how the National Mediation Board is feeling that day.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Been that way forever. Parking brake release with door closed was the standard for a long time. Now they have parking systems on the terminal that sense the aircraft and don’t start the clock until the aircraft pushes back, and stop the clock as soon as it’s parked even if you’re sitting there for 30 minutes waiting for the jet bridge or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah but they also used to have a good enough pay that it was still an okay deal, even if the clock only ran during aircraft movement. It's still the case with other airlines I have an old friend that went to work for Etihad and he seems to be doing fine. Tells me about the nice weekends away all over the world during rest time, lives in a nice apartment in Dubai with a view, etc. Granted I'd never want to live there but I'm sure you can achieve similar lifestyle with other international airlines (Singapore, KLM, etc etc).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If your boss requires you to be somewhere at a specific time.. then that is work .. right?

And being on the other end means you are still at work. It is strange that this job went from glamorous to real shit.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is strange that this job went from glamorous to real shit.

You had a government mandated floor on prices until the 70's in the USA and the 90's in the EU, which meant that airlines had to compete on amenities and other ways to pull traffic to their airline. Once that price floor was removed, it became apparent that ticket prices were what drove most traffic, so airlines started doing whatever they could to drop ticket prices.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Nice write up, thanks. TIL.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope the unions give these bastards a nice, swift kick in the ass.

If anyone should be taking a pay cut, it's the shitty CEO's whose decisions make flying a miserable experience.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If this were in a free country, sure. But these unions need government permission to strike.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't know that.

Ain't that a fucking bitch.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Welcome to "democracy"

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nobody wants to work anymore.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

"Nobody wants to work anymore."

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't flown in a while, have they already started asking us to tip flight attendants?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remember, they're the ones that close the doors (or don't)!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it is Boeing that decides if it stays closed

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

guys does making airline workers unable to afford life make passengers less safe?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

they are only set to warn little more than $27,000 per year before tax.

I know that writing is hard, especially when using AI, but please proof read your posts?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh no, a typo from hitting a key right next to the intended key, this has never happened in the history of journalism!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Not only that, the the typo is a legitimate word, meaning it won't be flagged by spell check. HOWEVER, that's no excuse to not proofread a submitted article. In fact, it's more reason why one should.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Time to unionize, I think.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

They are already

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thats has to be from the onion! ( I hope at least )

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

But tHe inVisIbLe haNd

load more comments
view more: next ›