this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
119 points (96.9% liked)

Religious Cringe

1005 readers
1 users here now

About

This is the official Lemmy for the r/ReligiousCringe***** subreddit. This is a community about poking fun at the religious fundamentalist's who take their religion a little bit too far. Here you will find religious content that is so outrageous and so cringeworthy that even someone who is mildly religious will cringe.

Rules

  1. All posts must contain religious cringe. All posts must be made from a religious person or must be showcasing some kind of religious bigotry. The only exception to this is rule 2

  2. Material about religious bigots made by non-bigots is only allowed from Friday-Sunday EST. In an effort to keep this community on the topic of religious cringe and bigotry we have decide to limit stuff like atheist memes to only the weekends.

  3. No direct links to religious cringe. To prevent religious bigots from getting our clicks and views directs links to religious cringe are not allowed. If you must a post a screenshot of the site or use archive.ph. If it is a YouTube video please use a YouTube frontend like Piped or Invidious

  4. No Proselytizing. Proselytizing is defined as trying to convert someone to a particular religion or certain world view. Doing so will get you banned.

  5. Spammers and Trolls will be instantly banned. No exceptions.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Other Similar Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Photons literally the only thing you can see πŸ˜‚

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No, photons is what you sense. Seeing implies post processing. Looking and seeing are not the same.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why did you post my picture? Some privacy please!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Give yourself some credit, you have way more hair than that. Sure, it's not on your head, but you do really well with what you've got.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I know this wasn't exactly your point, but studies have shown human eyes can perceive individual photons, which is pretty wild when you think about it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

This is such a Lemmy comment

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

I can do strawman arguments too!

Christians: You have to have faith!

Also Christians: I dont trust vaccines!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

So I guess blind people would be having a real hard time with this logic

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess you could probably say you can see photons even if you couldn't individually pick them out.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have a vague memory that someone tested whether we can see individual photons and it turned out we can, but do not quote me on that. I'll do some searching to see if I can find a relevant study

edit: well that was easy https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12172

Despite investigations for over 70 years, the absolute limits of human vision have remained unclear. Rod cells respond to individual photons, yet whether a single-photon incident on the eye can be perceived by a human subject has remained a fundamental open question. Here we report that humans can detect a single-photon incident on the cornea with a probability significantly above chance. This was achieved by implementing a combination of a psychophysics procedure with a quantum light source that can generate single-photon states of light. We further discover that the probability of reporting a single photon is modulated by the presence of an earlier photon, suggesting a priming process that temporarily enhances the effective gain of the visual system on the timescale of seconds.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At night (in the dark), everything you see has fluctuating intensity. This is change in the number of photons that you detect - when there are few photons, the number of photons per second per detection cell noticeably fluctuates, and you can see that, easily.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

At night (in the dark), everything you see has fluctuating intensity. This is change in the number of photons that you detect

Change in the number of photons and noise from your wetware.

But yeah, it's pretty neat that our peepers have a built-in gain system

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The only faith a true scientist needs is faith of the heart.

Obligatory it's been a long road

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Traveling from there to here...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I don't believe in anything that can't be observed, measured or tested.

If I am ever presented evidence of something that I have observed, measured or tested being incorrect, I will change my mind and adopt the new evidence rather than cling to my own faulty worldview.

That's science. No faith required.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is funny. Yes athiests in the dark ages did not "believe" in radio signals because we don't believe in things we accept reality as we discover it. Which is why our "beliefs" change over time. We know there are radio signals and atoms and photons. Obsiously god not so much. no idea why they list time and thoughts in the image given the concepts have been around for quite some time.