hydroptic

The hell did you want me to call it then? "Military service" is a completely common expression to use, and it applies whether we like what they're doing or not.

And before you get any bright ideas: no, I'm not American and no, I don't support what their military does. This kind of completely pointless semantic wankery just really activates my almonds

Dying in nuclear hellfire seems preferable to all this fucking bullshit

Oh no, bad behaviour! Anything but that!

Remember, any resistance to fascist takeovers must be well-behaved

Well that's a huge surprise

Both world wars look like "clear lines" to you after the fact. Of course you can just point at, say, Ferdinand getting assassinated and go "yeah that's what started WW I" but do you think anyone at that time thought "yup that's going to start the mother of all wars"?

As others have pointed out they absolutely didn't look like clear lines when they were kicking off.

But don't expect any medical treatment after your service if you're a Democrat or unmarried: ‘Extremely disturbing and unethical’: new rules allow VA doctors to refuse to treat Democrats, unmarried veterans

Maybe explain to me how people baselessly criticising technology (like typewriters for example) for making people dumber is the same as a scientific study showing differences in EEG activity?

I'm sure more guns would have fixed this situation /s

Most normal chan user

Sounds more like good news to me

… what.

This article is about a scientific study that shows clear differences in brain activity between people who used LLMs and those who didn't. If you can't tell the difference between that and whatever the hell you're going on about, you might want to cut down on the LLM usage.

Similar criticisms have probably been leveled at many other technologies in the past, such as computers in general, typewriters, pocket calculators etc.

Show me a study where they find typewriter users "consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels"