this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
141 points (96.7% liked)

HistoryPorn

6889 readers
111 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  4. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Illustrations

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago (3 children)

If you had an Irishman in Eritrea paying another to kick his boat out on to the water so he could go hunting with one of these guns, you'd have a man in Punt with a punt paying punts for a punt at his punt

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Richard-Osman-level pun

t

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

And if he only needed a tiny bit of distance, he'd do well to watch out for the rare-but-devastating fake punt.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punt_gun?wprov=sfla1

Punt guns were usually custom-designed and varied widely, but could have bore diameters exceeding 2 inches (51 mm) and fire over a pound (≈ 0.45 kg) of shot at a time. A single shot could kill over 50 waterfowl resting on the water's surface. They were too big to hold and the recoil was so large that they had to be mounted directly on punts used for hunting, hence their name. Hunters would manoeuvre their punts quietly into line and range of the flock using poles or oars to avoid startling them. Generally, the gun was fixed to the punt; thus the hunter would manoeuvre the entire boat in order to aim the gun. The guns were sufficiently powerful, and the punts sufficiently small, that firing the gun often propelled the punt backwards several inches or more. To improve efficiency, hunters could work in fleets of up to around ten punts.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Nothing about this looks safe ☠️ but I guess it was really about the load, not about the velocity.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

https://youtu.be/bTQQfKxkZpk?si=qmulJVPNfha6JET0

IIRC they banned them in the US because they were too good at "hunting" waterfowl.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Oh wow, that’s like a cannon! I thought you’d have to get your ducks in a row, but nope.

e: I can’t spell

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Looks like paper shells loaded with lots of shot were the default ammunition.

I’m going to guess that chamber pressure would be quite low. It seems no more dangerous than firing a normal shotgun really.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago