this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
16 points (94.4% liked)

Danger Dust - What Else?

380 readers
2 users here now

A community for those occupationally exposed to dusts, toxins, pollutants, hazardous materials or noxious environments

Dangerous Dusts , Fibres, Toxins, Pollutants, Occupational Hazards, Stonemasonry, Construction News and Environmental Issues

#Occupational Diseases

#Autoimmune Diseases

#Silicosis

#Cancer

#COPD

#Chronic Fatigue

#Hazardous Materials

#Kidney Disease

#Pneumoconiosis

#The Environment

#Pollutants

#Pesticides

and more

Please be nice to each other and follow the rules : []https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The pathogenic potential of inhaling the inert fibrous nanomaterials used in thermal insulation (such as asbestos or fibreglass) is actually connected not to their chemical composition, but instead to their geometrical characteristics and size. 

The reason for this is the inability of the macrophages naturally present in pulmonary alveolar tissue to eliminate foreign bodies that are too large. 

This discovery poses a challenge for the use of inert nanofibre felts in construction, which had heretofore been deemed to be less harmful than the asbestos it replaced, but that in reality could present the same health risks for those handling it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GlitchyDigiBun 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If you read the damn article, you'd know it has nothing to do with it's chemical properties, but the geometry of the fibers forcing cells to rupture as they stretch to encapsulate the tissues, and it's THOSE chemicals that are harmful to the Aviolic tissues.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You must not have understood the comment. It's reasonable, sort of.

Point #1: Obviously it not due to chemistry because asbestos is chemically inert becsuse... it doesn't burn. [Dubious]

Point #2: We've learned nothing and are using nano fibers again. This is dumb because the harm from asbestos is obviously from its size and shape. Haven't we known this forever?

Nothing about their comment says they think it's because of the chemical properties of asbestos.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago