this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
16 points (94.4% liked)
Danger Dust - What Else?
380 readers
2 users here now
A community for those occupationally exposed to dusts, toxins, pollutants, hazardous materials or noxious environments
Dangerous Dusts , Fibres, Toxins, Pollutants, Occupational Hazards, Stonemasonry, Construction News and Environmental Issues
#Occupational Diseases
#Autoimmune Diseases
#Silicosis
#Cancer
#COPD
#Chronic Fatigue
#Hazardous Materials
#Kidney Disease
#Pneumoconiosis
#The Environment
#Pollutants
#Pesticides
and more
Please be nice to each other and follow the rules : []https://mastodon.world/about
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If you read the damn article, you'd know it has nothing to do with it's chemical properties, but the geometry of the fibers forcing cells to rupture as they stretch to encapsulate the tissues, and it's THOSE chemicals that are harmful to the Aviolic tissues.
You must not have understood the comment. It's reasonable, sort of.
Point #1: Obviously it not due to chemistry because asbestos is chemically inert becsuse... it doesn't burn. [Dubious]
Point #2: We've learned nothing and are using nano fibers again. This is dumb because the harm from asbestos is obviously from its size and shape. Haven't we known this forever?
Nothing about their comment says they think it's because of the chemical properties of asbestos.
whoosh
Uhh lots of chemicals are fireproof too… that means literally nothing.
Four days and your only rebuttal is an insult and missing the point yet again? I knew it was pointless to point out your folley.
Lots of flammable stuff is also chemically stable at “great heat” (the fuck kind of unit is this…?), what’s your point? It seems you’ve just missed the point here actually.
Did you read this article at all?