this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
76 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15996 readers
3 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 years ago (6 children)

actually, its bad to say that the organisation of british colonial subjects is led by britain

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

ukraine joining the last crumbling remnant of the british empire in TYOOL 2024 would be extremely funny.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago

Ukraine: please can we have NATO membership?

Britain: but we already have NATO membership at home

The NATO membership at home:

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

the common hell of being associated with bri ish

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There were suggestions of Ukraine joining apparently.

Bruh that would have started world war 3

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Britain doesn't have nuclear weapons so it'll be a quick one at least.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Britain decided that nukes were too expensive to maintain, so their GPS-targetting system doesn't work without express permission from the Americans.

https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-trident-nuclear-program/

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“If the US pulled the plug on the UK nuclear program, Trident would be immediately unable to fire, making the submarines little more than expensive, undersea follies.”

michael-laugh

holy shit, i had no idea it was that bad

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's the reason why I said that the UK doesn't actually have nukes. They have all the expenses of trying to maintain a nuclear programme, but with none of the effective deterrence.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

fair, i knew the americans had a big role in trident, but i didn't know they could just turn the nukes off lol

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

Remember the Trashfuture bit where Milo argued that the UK is the only actually right wing country. Every other right wing project spends massive amounts of money on their millitary and their police, but the UK is so ideologically committed to austerity that they even did it to their imperial peacekeepers. Turns out they even did austerity to their nuclear programme, which is definitely a unique strategy.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

liberal imperialists are so funny. they want all the spoils of empire with none of the moral culpability.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

commonwealth

I just realized this is like the "democratic peoples republic" thing that libs accuse communist states of doing, except it's actually fake this time