this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
133 points (97.2% liked)

askchapo

23086 readers
113 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think a material difference between Iraq (v2 anyway) and Ukraine is that they can keep doing the "well Russia was the aggressor" thing indefinitely even if the reality is more complicated.

also yes obviously some libs are still stubborn about Iraq, the worst ones, but for the most part its generally agreed that the Iraq War was a bad thing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No. Their role is to support it, like Iraq, then lament the consequences after the fact as damage control.

I remember Chris Hedges saying something to that measure in regards to Iraq. The liberal intellectual class is there to support the state and American project.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I guess I should have been more specific, but when I say "libs" I'm not referring to the thought leaders, I'm referring to the rank and file. (This is generally what I mean when I use the term in a general sense actually).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

the rank and file will probably follow the thought leaders

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Rank and file turned on Iraq before the thought leaders did kinda