this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025

68 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9980 readers

520 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Toronto Blue Jays

Basketball

Toronto Raptors

Soccer

Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
Toronto FC

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

General:
- Canada Politics
- FairVote Canada
Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- Animal Protection Party of Canada
- NDP
By Province (alphabetical):
- BC Greens

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Carney: "Iran’s nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security, and Canada has been consistently clear that Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon." (x.com)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Iran’s nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security, and Canada has been consistently clear that Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon.

While U.S. military action taken last night was designed to alleviate that threat, the situation in the Middle East remains highly volatile. Stability in the region is a priority.

Canada calls on parties to return immediately to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis. As G7 leaders agreed in Kananaskis, the resolution of the Iranian crisis should lead to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza.

(With apologies for the Twitter link, this post doesn't seem to have been copied over to Bluesky.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] -6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (15 children)

Honestly part of me is agreeing that bombing these sites was good as long as they were building towards a nuke. If all this blows over in a month like a lot of things do lately, it is a bit of a safer world.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The USA intelligence people testified Iran wasn't building nukes, so who to believe?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then what are these facilities?

Would American intelligence reveal that they know they're building nukes if they had that information?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can refine uranium for power. Prior to trump breaking deals the Iranians had very low potent uranium. Mostly made up of 3.25 refinement. USA had dropped sanctions in agreement for not processing uranium past 20%. That was fine till trump got in power and broke the deal. Then they started refinement up to 60%. So there could be potential to further refine uranium over 90% purity to make weapons, but the amount they had was tiny, till trump fucked the deal

[+] [email protected] -12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I totally agree trump fucked the deal. He's an absolute narcissist. He wants to tear down anything from Democrats. He wants to put his name on everything.

But at the end of the day, I'm kind of rooting for him here. I'm hoping this all blows over quickly and we're in a world where Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons is crippled

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah cause the generations of Iranian children to come will just shrug and say “big Daddy America was correct to take away our stuff”

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I seriously doubt its all going to blow over. No retailiation by Iran sends a signal of " bomb us anyone, we don't fire back "

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For sure, but Iran doesn't have many options do they? I think by blow over, I mean they'll retaliate in the way these countries do. They will signal their attack loudly and early. USA and Israel will have time to prepare. Iran attacks. America says fuck you and does a return. Iran again does another attack with a huge signal to say look we're retaliating. Then it's all back to business as usual. Everybody gets to say they did something and they're all big bad boys.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

From a friend that has connections there, some Iranians welcomed the assaults because they want their current leader removed. And I'm sure USA would love to install a leader there again.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

That's what I'm hearing of too. I'll honestly admit if Trump pulled this move and it leads to a regime change. Fuck I'll give it to him as a ballsy move that worked. I would think at this point if it works, and I were to deny the victory I would be doing it just because I don't like Trump and I think that's something I don't want to do just out of spite.

load more comments (13 replies)