this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
57 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

2853 readers
33 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why not just use a water reservoir which will also fill with water when it rains.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

A Swiss company is trying this, though using concrete instead of water. Wear and tear and moving parts are disadvantages though.

https://www.swiss.tech/news/giant-gravity-batteries-storage-renewable-energies

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

This has no moving parts compared to water storage which requires pumping, and you’re describing hydroelectric power that requires building of dams or levees. Reservoirs are inefficient, have issues with evaporation, and basically flood habitat.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Dams have major ecological impacts. Water towers could work but as I understand it storing heat in sand or salt is more energy dense/efficient vs elevated water and gravity. All of what I just said is based solely on things I've read some time ago but cannot cite, and documentaries about dams