-21
Generated Summary below:
Main Topic: The Ukraine conflict, focusing on the strategic failures of the US and the West, Russia's position, and the potential for escalation.
Key Points:
- US Strategy Failure: The US gambled on pulling Ukraine into the Western orbit via NATO enlargement, believing Russia would fold. This was a miscalculation, as Ukraine is a core issue for Russia.
- Trump's Position: Trump initially wanted to disengage from the conflict, recognizing it wasn't in America's interest. However, he faces pressure from the "deep state" and his recent statements show he may be succumbing to the normal politics of Washington.
- European War Mongering: European countries are criticized for not focusing on achieving peace, instead pushing for continued war.
- Zelensky's Role: Zelensky is portrayed as a dictator who is leading his people to destruction with no clear prospect of success.
- Russia's Stance: Russia has consistently sought negotiations to address the root causes of the conflict (NATO enlargement, security issues). They've laid out their terms and are willing to negotiate.
- Nuclear Risk: The drone attacks on Russian strategic bomber bases are seen as a dangerous escalation, potentially triggering Russia's nuclear doctrine. The UK is accused of playing a leading role in these attacks, acting as a terrorist nation.
- Ukraine's Desperate Measures: Ukraine's recent actions (attacks on bridges, drone strikes) are characterized as acts of terrorism born out of desperation, having no real impact on the war's outcome.
- Russia's Diplomatic and Operational Genius: Russia is praised for its diplomatic handling of the situation, particularly in the recent negotiations.
- Internal Instability in Europe: Many European nations are facing political instability and questioning the current policies regarding the conflict.
- Putin's Leadership: Putin is portrayed as a highly intelligent and stable leader who is preventing the situation from spiraling out of control.
Highlights:
- The speaker accuses the British of being a "terrorist nation" for their alleged involvement in the drone attacks on Russian strategic assets.
- The speaker claims that Russia is winning the war decisively and that Ukraine is on a path to total destruction.
- The speaker asserts that Putin is far more intelligent than Trump and other Western leaders.
- The speaker states that the CIA trained Ukrainian special operators on how to make C4-based explosives and infiltrate into Russia.
About Channel:
Dedicated to dialogue and peace!
At Dialogue works, we believe there’s nothing more unstoppable than when people come together.
This group’s mission is to create a global community of diverse individuals who will support, challenge, and inspire one another by providing a platform for Dialogue.
We encourage you to share your knowledge, ask questions, participate in discussions, and become an integral part of this little community. Together we can become a better community and provide our members with a much better experience.
The Ukrainian government are willing pawns of the West; profit is the goal of these forever wars.
Peace has always been an option, since 2022 and before, but Western intelligence organizations and politicians continue to prolong the mass murder of the working class, again for quarterly profits.
Professor Jeffrey Sachs is one of many that are not lackeys of the oligarchs.
He does a good job of explaining the history and events that lead to where we are.
How exactly does this answer the questions "Do you think Ukraine should surrender? Would more of their workers be better off under Putin?"
How would Ukraine obtain this peace, without surrendering? Which intelligence agencies and politicians are making money from the war? That's what you mean by "again for quarterly profits," correct?
Cross-post of my reply, quoted:
"Well, I think Ukrainian workers would be better off without the current corrupt government that continues to want war.
A newly elected government that is for neutrality and against joining NATO, while not being a pawn of the Western regimes, would greatly help the Ukrainian workers.
This newly elected government would have to be able to be diplomatic with its neighbor instead of doing what the Western regimes want, which is profit-driven forever wars."
Diplomacy and negotiations would be required, as well as not wanting to join NATO and staying neutral.
The CIA and US military had been in Ukraine before 2014, as well as other Western agencies and military.
The military-industrial complex, they supply the weapons and bombs, and the land is flattened.
Then similar companies come back to rebuild.
These companies lobby (legal bribes) the Western regimes.
Make sure to check out non-Western propaganda and reporting; there are many great independent journalists and commentators as an addition to our preferred daily propaganda sources.
Professor Jeffery Sachs does a great job of explaining the history of events that continue to push the escalation in Russia-Ukraine.
The Grayzone also does articles on Russia and Ukraine:
https://thegrayzone.com/?s=Ukraine
https://thegrayzone.com/?s=russia
How is being a pawn of Putin any better than being a pawn of the west? We're talking about the lives and income of "workers" here. Seems to me the average worker in Ukraine would have way more opportunity if Ukraine is aligned with the west than with Putin.
You say that like it's never been tried before. Tell me, what should Ukraine give up in order to obtain peace? Because Russia's terms for peace are essentially "Surrender."
Also why exactly would Ukraine not want to join NATO, especially since they've been invaded? Seems to me this is like telling someone you've threatened to kill that they're not allowed to call the police. Who in their right mind would agree to that?
Please tell me how they are making money. The question was "Which intelligence agencies and politicians are making money from the war?" Please tell me how, exactly, the CIA is "making money" and which politician is "making money," i.e war profiteering, because that is your actual claim.
So your contention then is that corporations in "the west" are artificially extending the war by supplying Ukraine, specifically so they can profit from it, is that correct? Just want to be sure I'm not misunderstanding.
If that is right, then what, exactly, is your solution for Ukraine, which is not surrendering? Please assume for this discussion that surrender is not an option.