ysjet

US citizens do not want this shit.

More to point, the idiots that voted for this while thinking it would happen are a very, very small minority.

And even then, it's looking reaaaal likely that a significant amount of those votes for this shit were faked.

Accelerationism in a nutshell.

There's also just a substantial number of people that were just astroturfers, I think.

There's been a LOT of crazy attacks on the switch 2 to try to 'justify' a boycott. I think my two favorite was that the gamechat button noise when you hit is actually saying saying a slur, or maybe that the rumble turns off after a while not to protect your hands from the rumble (which has been found to be bad for you), but because Nintendo cheaped out on a rumble motor that overheated too easily.

The switch 2 joycons don't have a rumble motor. Like, it's a whole thing they're super proud of, because it's so precise they just use the rumble really fast to play music instead of having a speaker.

Honestly, the whole idea of trying to boycott nintendo has pretty much always been over astroturfed bullshit, or just outright bullshit.

She's literally been a major feminist activist and UN ambassador for over a decade.

Trust me, we know. Feel free to hit american companies in their pocketbooks though. It's the only way they'll learn. And maybe they'll fuck off and get out of our government too.

Aww look, now the sealion is moving the goalposts.

We know what you are, go away.

Ah yes, the strawman that ignores context entirely. Nice.

See, if they weren't white, they would have been charged with greater crimes despite only 'attempting' to do this. And you know this.

Fuck off with your sealioning, you damn well know they're right.

Lol, good try, but we know it's the same.

My man, if you slapped something at 32,000 miles per hour, you don't have a hand to cook anymore :P

My understanding is that most testers found it's about 4ms better than the switch 1, and the only tester that found it worse refuses to actually outline their methodology, and nobody can reproduce the 30ms+ number.

Except other testers found it to be ~4ms faster than the switch 1, in tests where they actually give their methodology.

Monitors unboxed just went "yeah it's 30+ms, source: trust me bro"

So basically, the news here is that the switch 2 screen is better than the switch 1 at 17ms vs 21ms, except for one singular tester that claims 30+, which no other independent tester collaborates... And then they go and compare it to screens that cost multiple times the entire switch's cost... And this is presented as a bad thing?

Are you kidding me rn