yetAnotherUser

It's literally the exact opposite. This guy isn't a ghost. He's a fucking beacon.

Want to be as stealthy as possible? Then be as "normal" as possible. Use only corporate social media and use it frequently. Pay for Adobe Reader. Engage in celebrity gossip and drama.

And then, once you have manufactured this persona, you can actually remain hidden from surveillance and do whatever you want to remain hidden.

For anyone else wondering what a "MENSA" member is:

Mensa International is the largest and oldest high-IQ society in the world.[3][4][5] It is a non-profit organization open to people who score at the 98th percentile or higher on a standardised, supervised IQ or other approved intelligence test.

I was already questioning why school/university cafeteria staff should get any benefits that aren't present in other jobs.

How? Nowadays GIMP is predominantly used for the software and all the top results reflect that.

Hell, GIMP is only used for the software in non-English speaking countries.

The store will be liable for any and all damages to life and property which incurs from selling faulty products though.

There's significantly more risk when purchasing directly from a Chinese supplier. It's borderline impossible to hold a foreign company with no actual presence in your country accountable for damages.

Literally every single government on this planet classifies and restricts weapons based on potential of danger/lethality.

Anything from knife types/blade lengths to gun caliber is regulated everywhere. The same applies to chemicals with which explosives/poisons can be manufactured. You can't order them in any country without filling out forms.

It's literally the most basic type of risk assessment possible and by far the most effective way to reduce harm.

Is the first shirt edited? It has a different font and theme ("obnoxious" atheism rather than self-disparagement).

My point is there is clearly a limit to how many people a weapon can kill before no sane person would allow people to possess it.

Apparently, for you this number is greater than 61 deaths per weapon, seeing as this is the number of people killed in the Las Vegas Mass Shooting.

So, which is it? 100? 1000? 1 million? When is a weapon too dangerous to be available commonplace in your opinion?

Should we every single person this planet access to nuclear weapons? Mutually Assured Destruction has kept us save from nuclear war thus far. Clearly this applies not just on the state but on the individual level as well.

Technically speaking Beethoven was born in Austria. Austrian Netherlands that is (current day Belgium), owned by the Habsburgs.

Or even more generally, he was born in the Holy Roman Empire of Germanic Nations (today Switzerland, Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, parts of France, parts of Poland, Austria, Czechia, Germany) and died in the Austrian Empire.

It's divided into the Soviet Republics I believe.

There's also Eastern Germany so the map cannot be from any later than 1990.

Rough tiled surfaces are noisy though. It would be pretty annoying if you live next to such a road if there is more than a homeopathic amount of car traffic.

That's not to say having a 4-lane highway in front of your door would be any better. Just that rough tiling isn't ideal for noise (even when adjusted to the lowered speed).

They also have decent records of relevant political figures which are in no doubt in the hands of the US.

Seriously, the nazis were able to compile lists of political enemies (suspected to be) in Brtiain 85 years ago.

It's not a stretch to suggest the US knows exactly who is relevant to keeping the regime alive, whom to imprison and whom to kill.

Collapsing a nation is far easier than establishing a new one after all.