Most platforms proxy media shared.
Then your proposed workaround is still 1 click more than the reported one.
wholookshere
joined 1 year ago
I have yet to hear anyone irl that identifies as left that actually wants to hear what the right has to say.
Right now it's all hate and bigotry. Which has no place in society as far as I'm concerned.
The only people I've seen concerned with people Hering out the right, are people on the right. "Centrists" are just right wing sympathizers.
So yes, I don't think they're actually left leaning.
I agree with the comment your replying to. It's very fellow kids. It's not how most people on the left talk.
Note: not the person you replied to.
Ubisoft isn't the victim here, consumers buying broken games are.
So what, you think they shouldn't be reviewed bad for a broken game?
No, it's broken and shouldn't be for sale if they're not going to fix it.
Guess what, as a mobile dev, my job is to fix the broken shit on multiple OSs as well. It's the territory.
It's almost like you can delist it in such a way you prevent people from paying money for a broken game with no intention of updating it again, and still leave it for people who currently have copies.
Wow that was such a garbage take.
Sure
But when people are replying to
https://lemm.ee/comment/17210238
Saying that anyone not calling out Microsoft is biased, is a bad take. And I'm not sure what your point of more context is needed?
A broken game gets negative reviews. I'm not sure what's biased about this.
Yes! That's a very common use case for VPNs in the corporate world.
So tailscale client, the apps you actually download are open source. What's not open source is the server side code.
Because the interface of tailscale is publicly known and available, someone went and made an open source server side version compatible with tailscale clients.
What's tail scale?
It's an easy to use VPN. I can expose just my server to the vpn and my community can easily gain access.
That yes, it doesn't bother me that Ubisoft is a consumer of Microsoft.
If Ubisoft doesn't update their product, they should be reviews negatively. If they don't like it they should de list it so people don't pay money for a broken product.
So, people should leave positive reviews for games that no longer work?
Like I get what your saying. It's not Ubisoft's fault.
But if they're not going to fix their old game, than it should be reviewed negatively so people don't spend money on a game that no longer works.
If they don't want that, than delist it.
Would that make it okay if that wild rant was true?
The devil doesn't need advocates. He's president.