weirdwallace75

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Prove what? That you can't cite a law?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

You're saying absolute goddamned nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

If he's always on top of things, why is he doing this now and not sooner?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

No, wrong. Or else teachers would be able to make copies of textbooks, and they're not.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, this is definitely wrong. Giving away something you don't own is still illegal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hm. You have very little knowledge of American healthcare.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's beyond bad taste and into active stupidity.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Google's gotten worse, but some people are still asking it questions in natural language and have absolutely no idea how quotes work.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This towel is warmer and bitier than usual.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There are whole-ass companies selling laptops with Linux preinstalled now. They work. Even with Bluetooth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

You skipped glass as an option.

Glass is heavy and fragile, and dangerous when it breaks.

28
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

A good post about the kinds of arguments people use online, including tactics which are about the argument itself or some of the people involved in the argument, as opposed to being about the argument's supposed topic.

You should know this to, one, avoid pointless "debates" where no actual issues get debated, two, to improve your own debate style to focus on the issues that need to be debated most, and, three, to see when others are merely acting like they're debating without actually debating the core issues the debate is supposed to be about.

view more: next ›