vrighter

opposite or not, they are both tasks that the fixed-matrix-multiplications can utterly fail at. It's not a regulation thing. It's a math thing: this cannot possibly work.

If you could get the checker to be correct all of the time, then you could just do that on the model it's "checking" because it is literally the same thing, with the same failure modes, and the same lack of any real authority in anything it spits

so? It was never advertised as intelligent and capable of solving any task other than that one.

Meanwhile slop generators are capable of doing a lot of things and reasoning.

One claims to be good at chess. The other claims to be good at everything.

the driver itself is kilobytes in size. Megabytes is huge for such a simple thing

how does that stop the checker model from "hallucinating" a "yep, this is fine" when it should have said "nah, this is wrong"

the first one was confident. But wrong. The second one could be just as confident and just as wrong.

what makes the checker models any more accurate?

i know you meant live metal. But I love the concept of love metal. There's a spark between us

raytracing still needs to do subsurface scattering. It can actually do it for real though. It also "wastes" a lot of bounces, so is usually approximated anyway

the word insisting shows your arrogance. Insisting on something implies one has a choice. Those who are sticking with X11 are doing so because wayland just does not do what they need.

when I need to type a dangerous command, i prepend it with #, so it's just a comment.

Only when I'm really sure do i go back to the start of the line and remove the #

you made me snort coffee out of my nose. I hoepe you're proud of yourself