vaguerant

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This doesn't belong in Not The Onion, the Betoota Advocate is extremely satirical. OP ate the onion and then posted it on Not The Onion.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Did you all hear the recent announcement that they're making a Spaceballs 2? It's scheduled for 2027. Bill Pullman (Lone Starr), Daphne Zuniga (Vespa), Rick Moranis (Dark Helmet) and Mel Brooks (Yogurt) are all returning, alongside new characters played by Lewis Pullman (Bill's real son), Josh Gad and Keke Palmer. I'm not even joking.

https://deadline.com/2025/06/spaceballs-2-casts-rick-moranis-bill-pullman-keke-palmer-1236431204/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think this one's pretty fun. The one disappointment for me is that the story sacrifices all its complexity by making the Gelth generic evil monsters. The moral question of reusing the bodies of the dead is an interesting one that the episode ultimately doesn't have to bother reckoning with because it turns out the Gelth really suck. It's the rare twist that makes the story less compelling. It's already pretty twisty to do a zombie body snatcher plot where it turns out the snatchers aren't evil, so pivoting back to them being evil again is just a bit boring.

Otherwise, I like how the episode makes good use of a historical figure. They can sometimes feel a bit hit and miss, but Dickens makes for a good one-off companion who doesn't suffer a major character assassination, etc. It is mildly weird that we have two episodes in a row where a one-off companion burns up (Jabe last week, Gwyneth this week). I wonder if more thought goes into episode order in later series, just to avoid stories echoing each other's plot points. It's not really a problem, but you wouldn't want to turn it into a pattern.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All right, we've come to my least favorite episode of the entire series. We have a character throughout the episode who has for years been dosing the people around him with date rape drugs. The worst reaction this gets from anybody on The Orville is "Aww, come on, mate. That's a bit rude." There are zero consequences for any of it. This one plot point taints my feelings about everything else in the episode.

I'm not in the mood for any of the comedy material--in fact, it's even worse on a rewatch. On first viewing. you don't know about the serial date rapist until the reveal. On a rewatch, the foreshadowing is peppered in right from the start with Darulio insisting on a handshake with Mercer. The dramatic plot of the episode also ends up tied in to non-consensually dosing people. Overall, just very unpleasant stuff. Not a fun watch. I'd rather have "Majority Rule" on repeat for 24 hours.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"It really tied the room together."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's already several comments saying "depends on the beliefs and how important they are," and obviously there's that.

I'll add that there are beliefs people don't immediately think of when talking about religion. There's religious humanism, which is a secular religion based around behaving ethically which also has a bunch of traditions similar to spiritually-based religions, minus the spirituality. Adherents (can) attend church and hear sermons on ways to be a better person, etc.

I'm not a religious humanist but they sound like they're probably decent enough people. They're quite different to my generic fediverse atheist/irreligious views, in the sense that I don't have any desire to attend congregations of people who identify as religiously ethical, but I don't harbor any strong objections to their beliefs.

Personally, I understand it more as something that might be nice for people who have left spiritual religion but still want the trappings of a place to go and be with a community of like-minded people, but that's not my experience. Ultimately, that's probably about as far as I'd be comfortable, where we have roughly equivalent spiritual views but highly divergent religious views.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I see it on the other end: https://sopuli.xyz/post/29094211

Maybe it just took some time to get across?

[–] [email protected] 124 points 2 weeks ago

Aha! Got it, thank you so much.

[–] [email protected] 163 points 2 weeks ago (34 children)

I understand why this is wrong (order of operations dictates the division happens first, so it's really 25 - 1 = 24), but why is it funny? I don't mean "This isn't funny," I think I'm just missing the joke.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This is a tough question because it's like asking "What's the most forgettable game you've ever played?" I can remember some of the best and worst games I've ever played, but mediocre games are explicitly not interesting.

That said, the first one that came to mind for me was Starshot: Space Circus Fever for N64. It's just a very generic late-'90s collectathon platformer. It's hard to be mad at it, because it's not terrible or anything, there's just no reason to play it. If you've got an N64, there's Mario, Banjo, Rayman, even B- and C-tier stuff like Gex and Chameleon Twist. There's hidden gems like Space Station Silicon Valley or Rocket: Robot on Wheels.

That last one is the only reason I played Starshot, I saw it clearanced at a used game store and was like "Oh yeah, I remember hearing this game was good," but it turned out I was thinking of Rocket. That game actually is good, while Starshot is just fine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Signing in from the "traumatized by Cassandra" brigade. Even knowing how this one ended, I still spent most of the episode worried somebody was going to trip over and tear right through her.

It's funny to see this episode starting out being thrifty with the budget (opening with a time travel montage where we only see the inside of the TARDIS) and then very spend-y a few minutes later (CGI everything, needle drops from Soft Cell and Britney Spears). I don't know if BBC has any kind of special deal to use music for broadcast, but even if they do, it probably doesn't apply to streaming or home releases, so this episode has probably remained expensive.

According to Doctor Who Confidential, this one was deliberately high budget, as a showcase for what it can do at the top end of the scale. I'm not really sure what to make of it. High-budget Doctor Who is always a bit of a mixed bag. The most iconic villain is an upside-down dustbin, so how much does it stand to gain from a cash injection? The strongest stuff in this episode is in the smaller scenes, when Nine is chatting with either Jabe or Rose, or even when we're watching solo Rose contemplate mortality.

I don't dislike the episode, it's just not really doing what I expect to see from DW, which is a compelling story told for about six bob, using a bit of theatrical creativity and strongly written characters. Still, I guess it's good that it sets the bounds of what you should expect to see from the series: it's either people in mannequin suits or an effects extravaganza. If you haven't seen something you liked yet by this point, the show probably isn't for you.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Incredible showcase for Mark Jackson (Isaac) here. It's impressive how much he is able to do without a face.

Future episode spoilersWhile I imagine Jackson enjoys having so much more to work with in later seasons in terms of ... having a face, I do kind of miss this period where he just had to Mandalorian it up and give his performance with hand and body movements. Faceless Isaac was always done very well.

Isaac learning to provide comfort by holding hands is done effectively and his understanding that Claire needs the same is a genuine moment. I love the Isaac and Claire/Finn family pairing, so this episode does great by me. Can't argue with the classic "stranded on a hostile planet" structure, either. It's definitely a cliche by this point and the episode doesn't do anything to subvert it, but it solidly executes the premise. To some extent, solidly executing an existing idea is the whole point of The Orville, so I think the show is achieving its goals here.

The episode seems to have been important, internally. Penny Johnson Jerald described the episode as her favorite at the time, and Seth MacFarlane said that putting together a show that was serious, dramatic and character-led charted the course for season 2:

MacFarlane also spoke fondly about the Orville's first season, singling out one particular episode that helped convince him that the show's tone -- a target of critics -- worked well for him and fans.

"One of the really successful episodes to me in the first season was the one where Claire and Isaac are trapped on that planet alone," MacFarlane said. "It was a very dark, kind of somber episode that still lived in that world very successfully. That episode for me in the first season was a real test of how far we can take the genuine science fiction aspect to it."

view more: ‹ prev next ›