uzi

Drug use is a cultural problem, including for alcoholism. Look at the countries that produce the street drugs, they have no struggles with addiction in their broader society.

Rampant open drug use and getting high in public in Canada is an indictment of how screw up Canadians are because they really don't care as much for others as Canadians like to think they do. They want to feel good like the con of a lie about "I'm a good perso" but refuse to make a personal commitment to build personal relationships with a variety of people so others don't live their life so alone and express a human connection.

It's not only about problems, people also need to share joyous moments with others, as well as with those who will help carry their burdens.

Individual rights and liberty.

You're free to emmigrate to Europe.

It's not possibke to be in government and someone not push what they believe. Since they are the ones making decisions that affect the lives of other people, then they are ultimately propagating some kind of a message. If you are anti-religion, then the government is run on an anti religion belief system and preaching a government message of anti-religion.

There is zero seperation between being a part of government and personal beliefs for those in government. If members of government practice their religion pulibly in office, in hinders on no one else.

If you are atheist, that is still a religion because you put your faith and belief in there beig ni God. So everybody is pushing sone kind of a message. Your argument is entirely one sided, a demand that the government can only be run in a way that suites you.

It's revealing how there are religious people who have no concerns about if others are religious or not, they live their own life regardless of others, but someone active avainst all religions seems to demand that others are not allowed to be religious in public. Very childish and self absorbed. It sounds like the issue is you you want zero accountability. You can't handle anybody criticizing your choices and criticiing your lifestyle.

No, there must be no establishment of religion, abd no restrictions there of. Members of government are free to pratice their faith in office.

If there is restriction on every and all forms of religion while in upblic office, there must restrictions on those who are against religion, they will be denied speech to comment on religion and be denied the ability to express any objection to religion.