reich
was that intentional, or you just wanted to say "rich"?
ulterno
joined 2 years ago
More akin to a rabbit-hole, due to that.
But who said rabbits don't shit in their holes?
Oh! And the soil is transparent.
communautarism
Definition?
The reason for that being that all the points I have put are fully valid.
The rest depends upon the persons inference.
- Having a separate coder and a packager means there is a good chance that another person (the packager) is looking at the code.
- And this other person is also most probably a separate entity, so if the coder is malicious, someone will know.
- Then comes the point of the distro community being more open and fragmented, as compared to a corporation, that can keeps their members' mouths shut using contracts and all
- For the same thing, the pro corpo guys will say that they have a single entity to go to for any problems. And since they have a contract (which maybe a b2b client-provider contract), their interests match.
- As opposed to some random chap on the internet, developing some Open Source thing as a hobby, purely for their own fun/ego/satisfaction.
I am a desktop person.
My main reasons for using a smartphone instead of a phone, are:
- GPS Maps. This is something I most probably won't be able to contribute to, while at the same time, I need it a lot.
- UPI (Unified Payments Interface). I can manage with paper money, but this is just too useful. If Linux mobile were to pick-up, I think I could manage to get it supported by the Govt.
- WhatsApp, because no matter how much I don't want to, others, including workplace teammates, will make that a requirement.
Until these requirements are met, I will associate Linux mobile with words like, "next" and "tomorrow".
Welcome to Linux for Mobile.
The next generation OS for keeping your smartphone private and your conversations (kinda) secure.
It's "next generation", because we probably won't have a good enough solution in the lifetime of the current generation's people.
But if you have both: enough money to buy an extra fairphone for testing and the time and ability to program drivers, please consider it.
π
But then they also went ahead and put backlashes on both of them. That makes me unsure.
Also, do your UIs not have the "Preview" and "view source" features?
Linux distros are waay worse!
They keep on advertising things like Desktop Environments and Window Managers and Display Managers and Printer Drivers!
And they don't even go about it subtly, like, one at a time. A single ad contains a list of around 10 or so Graphical Environments and even after you select one, it keeps on showing you the other ads, because you, apparently, can install as many of those things at the same time as your have HDD space for.
And then they keep advertising GRUB and systemd-boot! (Though I must give them credit for giving me the option of "No boot")
And even after you have finished installing, it is not enough, because you have to see an ad of 2 Network Card drivers, both being different versions of the same, because why not ?!
And turns out, everything that they give you in the package is actually third party! Meaning, stuff that has access to the lowest depths of your hardware, to stuff that you use to enter your bank details are all made by different people. So many people you have to put your trust into.
And if that's not enough, the people who compile it and send it to you might be totally different people from those who made the code!! What kind of heresy is this?
I see, so the confusion is about whether u/[email protected] intended the double eyebrow or they made a mistake with that and are being corrected for it.
I thought they wanted the double eyebrow, because why would you put 2 if you only wanted one? And if you wanted the "quote" option, you would just not escape the leftmost ">".
In case my above words are more confusing, Yes, it shows up as 2 sets of eyebrows for me too.
I thought that's what the Thread Starter wanted.
I don't get it.
Are you replying to "Except fun factβ¦no." - u/[email protected]
Or to my reply to it, that implies, maybe their renderer is non-standard and causing the backslashes to not work.
\>\>:| --> >>:| works pretty well for me.
I'm just waiting for it to be available here.
Probably going to be a while, considering most people won't pay the extra price for it, with much cheaper brands being available.
I set my clang-format to tabs only (actual tabs ASCII 0x9, no alignment and there is a continuation tab instead), then anyone can set their editor to whatever tab length they feel like and look at their code however they want.
But no spaces on the left of my code. This is for C, C++ and JSON.