ulterno

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was more disappointed by the inconsistency of their claims.

On the front page, they said that, they gave their livestock the highest quality feed and kept them happy in an open environment.
Upon reading further, they changed their tone to keeping them in small cages, followed with stuff like, "don't worry, you won't taste it".

They, as a company, lost credibility. Definitely not buying from them.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago

Satellite Hello World + Telescope Hello World ⇒ Hubble Space Telescope Hello World

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But it is the electric age!!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What/s the 's for?
Of course we use the horn battery.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, Trump did make a ton of people madly follow him.
It may be leading the world to ruin, but it is still leading.

I'd put the impact rating as "high".
The direction being undesirable.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, check for all of that using the high fidelity, self calibrating sensory cluster.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I honestly like the cognitive load. Just not when I am at the workplace, having to deal with said load, with the office banter in the background and (not so) occasionally, being interrupted for other stuff.
And my cognitive load is not even about the memory allocations, most of the time.

Off topic:

I think, if one is seriously learning programming from a young age, it is better to start with C, make a project, big enough to feel the difficulty and understand what the cognitive load is all about and get used to it, hence increasing their mental capability. Then learn the memory safe language of their choice.
I never made a big enough project in C, but you can get to feel the load in C++ too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

It's not just about bad/good C programmers. It's also about how much of the context, the given C programmer has read to make sure they know enough of what they are doing.

No matter how good one is at Programming, they need to make sure to read and remember what is happening in relevant parts of code, while making their one off contribution.

That's where the part of "leaving it to the computer" comes in. Hence, the usefulness of code checkers and even better if the compiler itself enforces the stuff. As long as the rules are good enough.

Let's just hope we are not jumping to another language 20 years down the line.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Even if you manage to keep all memory accesses in your memory, while writing the code, there's a good chance you'll forget something when reviewing another person's MR. That's probably the main problem creator.

Still, a language that you are familiar with, is better than a new language that you haven't finished reading the specifications of. And considering that adding new maintainers comes with a major effort of verifying trustworthiness, I get how it would be harder to switch.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

How about "finga"?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

The 70000 homes, are already there on the Nuclear Weapons sites.
Gov just realised, the homes needed more power than what the nuclear weapons gave them.

view more: ‹ prev next ›