ulterno

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

deleted by creator, who realised their misunderstanding

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Depends on HTTP 2.

Doesn’t work from the web.

Am I the only one who is weirded out? Requiring a web server for something and then requiring another server if you want it to actually work on the web?
How expensive do people want to make their deployments?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

JSON5

Nice. I mostly use Qt JSON and upon reading the spec, I see at least a few things I would want to have out of this, even when using it for machine-machine communication

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's "country-ist". Nothing to do with the genes of people living over there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I like the Doxygen's implementation and extension of Markdown. Pair it with PlantUML and you have something worth being a standard.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You were allowed a page “cheat sheet” to use on the exams, and the exams were pretty much the same problems with the numbers changed.

That seems like the worst way of making an exam.
In case the cheat sheet were not there, it would at least be testing something (i.e. how many formulae you memorised), albeit useless.

When you let students have a cheat sheet, it is supposed to be obvious that this will be a HOTS (higher order thinking skills) test. Well, maybe for teachers lacking said HOTS, it was not obvious.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, while writing this, I kinda wished the meme was 1 trillion instead.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

Well, if you have a large, underground, high pressure tank, a simple single-person household and only a few years to live.

... but possible.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You don't need to be a "misogynist douchebag" to know that putting 2 provocative women on a billboard will turn heads^[and do so, more than 2 men] and use that knowledge.
If that were the case, then most cosmetic/clothing/jewellery product companies would have their figureheads, labelled as such. Of course, they are not because they are considered "relevant".

But in the end, they all have the same in common: they care about their wallets more than people in another country they don't know.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Thanks, that definitely made it very simple to understand.

Still not 100% convinced on the applicability under various conditions^[and if I want to be, perhaps I should stop being lazy and go read the law], but I understand it from the Government POV. Kinda similar to the country-country hostage exchange we see in stories, which makes sure the other would have a reason not to renege on some agreement, even if they don't have a reason for mutual trust.

view more: ‹ prev next ›