Oui, notamment en France. Je suis en suisse, le systeme ETCS (niveau 2) est en place depuis 2000 et sera changé en 2030 pour le FRMCS. Je n'ai pas encore entendu parler encore de la mise en place du niveau 4 (conduite sans conducteur à bord).
Il y a encore de beau jour pour les conducteurs, et je vois que ca recrute bien aux CFF (pour y être passé il y a 2 ans), il y a un manque au moins pour le réseau voyageur, qui augmente en trafic.
Et en même temps, la transmission actuelle des informations entre trains à grande vitesse et centres de régulation, se fait avec la 2G. La mise à jour vers le systeme plus récent (5g apriori) n'est pas du tout en place.
Hi,
I'm hald-european, half-asian. from y expeiebce, blending in is an obvious choice. But I reallized, I'm not really asian, because I have european traits and references, and I'm not really european because I've asean traits and references. You will not be really part of any and both at the same time. You want to belong to a group, that's understandable. But you are in between, or better said you are the bridge between these groups. This is what's defining you. You can be part of each of them, using what you know about one group, and add spice or knowledge from the other. you are more that one group.
My experience, and I had a former superior who also was between 2 cultures : we don't really fit in to one pot. we are our own pot :)
My german side love a nice german beer, but my vietnamese side loves viet coffee. I love Frankfurter, Nürnberger, Müncher sausages in a bread, but I can't help my self with Cha Gio.
Go to group that are accepting you. And if they don't, too bad for them, there are plenty other groups, until you find your balance. And may be it means being in ultiple groups at the same time, and that's really really fine.
Je viens de faire une petite recherche ciblé autour de framasoft qui réalise cette présentation. Je n'ai rien trouvé dans ce sens a une date posterieure à la présentation. Toute ce que j'ai c'est la charte de respecte de la modération sur leur services. Après, peut-être que les moteurs de recherche n'ont pas indéxé des pages qui en parlent.
Ce que je vois aussi c'est que la modération n'est pas chose facile pour l'administrateur / administrattrice. Et des exemples de modération et modérateur / modératrice qui se déroulent mal, arrivent souvent sur les réseaux fédérés, pourtant bien plus petits que les mastodontes privées, certains à raison, mais aussi d'autres à tord.
Ben justement. Il y a une nouvelle video en place, des articles qui en parle ? Des sources sur ces avancements ?
La video a plus d'un an (février 2024), ca serait bien de voir la portée de cette vidéo et ce qui a été réalisé depuis !
Une petite recherche indique que l'USB-C est obligatoire sur les appareils dit nomade ou de petites tailles, depuis fin 2024, et sera obligatoire dès 2026 sur les ordinateurs portables. Ta question ne précise pas le type d'appareil qu'une entreprise vendrait. Si c'est de type nomade, pas le choix de l'USB-C pour la recharge. Sinon je ne vois que d'utiliser des piles type AA ou AAA. Pour les autres appareils, il ne semble pas avoir d'obligation.
Il y a l'effet du marché (je ne sais pas comment l'appeler). Les marques qui vont vendre en Europe (et pas juste l'Union européenne) vont utiliser de l'USB-C et simplement pour des coûts financier, vont mettre les même prises dans les marchés non-européens. Ca couterait trop cher d'avoir 2 types de prise et de charge.
Si cette entreprise vise le marché mondial sauf l'europe, elle devra vraiment faire le forcing, comme Apple l'a fait pour les iPhones. Mais elle se verrait soudain seule avec ses prises propriétaires, et qui pourrait devenir plus cher en terme de cout, si tous les autres utilisent de l'USB-C. Même si elle voulaient ne pas rentrer sur le marché européen, elle devvrait jouer avec les autres qui seraient passé à l'USB-C.
I’m curious how many european countries outside the Union will follow. Swiss cooperative Migros stopped labelling their food product, because it cost too much and was barely used.
From my understanding, you can’t post to an instance, until someone from that instance either subscribes to your lemmy account or the community or search for it. This will force the intance to pull your post to that instance.
The SILL About page translated explains the list :
https://code.gouv.fr/sill/readme
Why this catalog?
The socle interministériel de logiciels libres (SILL) is the reference catalog of open-source software recommended by the French government for use throughout the administration.
This catalog helps administrations find their way around the open-source software they are encouraged to use, in line with Article 16 of the French Law for a Digital Republic
If I follow your concept "not being fediverse", then Matrix or XMPP are not good because thy aren't fediverse neither. I would disagree. Fediverse is only a part of the internet. Pinksky is linked to ATproto, which in deed is developped by the company Bluesky. If the company Bluesky is sold, then nothing forbid to build a new relay, however, the cost of building a full blown one is quite high. But smaller dedicated relay can be build. True that isn't yet happening. PDS can be hosted privately already, and there are thousands non-bluesky-tied servers. Apps like Pinksky exsist and are not tied with the company Bluesky. The only part that is currently worrying me is the PLC server. Remember the very beginning of fediverse when it was under StatusNet Inc. It's only years later that it became decentralised as we know it today. StatusNet Inc. could have it enshitiffied multiple times. I may be an optimist, the company Bluesky can go wrong, but can do right too.
Australia should take example from countries having high-speed railways. Being Japan, China, or any Europaen countries. (gues, I'm in Europe ;) ) The US is a bad example. Sure you have large distance as in the US, but expertise is not there. There is only one highspeed line between Boston and New York city, if I'm correct).
High speed train need its own track, it's too fast at 300+ kmh, it needs protections from and for wild life around it, an onboard signaling system. All you don't need below 200kmh.
Contrary to the article, when a highspeed train uses normal tracks, it has to go slow (200kmh max), and use visual signals. It becomes a classic train. So there are expenses to be made building tracks for highspeed trains. It's not cheap.
Privatizing rails, taking examples from the UK and Paris - Bordeaux in France is a baaaaaaaad move. I think the UK rebought its first rail company. Paris - Bordeaux highspeed track is private and the french national operator SNCF must run its trains, even empty, to use it per contract. And seat prices are quite high compared to other (public) lines in France.
However as I see here in Switzerland, privatizaton can happen if well done. Switzerland has about 100 private rail, boat and coaches companies across the country... for 8 millions people, and one ticket and one timetable for everything. This is very centralized around the main train operator (which is a private company, 80% owned by the confederation).