turnip

joined 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Stopping imports from places like China, tightening monetary policy and hardening the currency, and rezoning all housing for maximum density would be the first step, the extremely low hanging fruit that is thousands of pounds in weight and boring into the ground.

But we wont do that will we, because its just another means to attract votes or to somehow benefit themselves.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Probably Canada I assume, given the debate is today.

Though continuing mass immigration to fill a labor shortage caused by QE and the phillips curve is not helping the poor, you cant pretend to help the poor while pushing up asset prices for the rich. Calling anyone questioning immigration a racist is a neat trick by progressives to justify UN defined slave labor.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Bernie Sanders?

The guy the DNC fought against to give us Hillary.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Youre increasing asset holders, mainly the rich, drastically while taking it from everyone else. Things are getting signifigantly worse as housing prices rise, birth rates fall, and populism inevitably increases.

We treat future promises of money, mainly debt, the same as we value existing money. Every loan is new money supply, which favors the rich who hold collateral, and who benefit the most from the cantillon effect. They also generally benefit the most from bailouts, which is just another symptom of loose money.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Mass immigration wont help with that, which is something all left leaning parties support right now.

In the 70s they blamed unions for causing wage inflation, and created laws to prevent wage negotiations, now we just do mass immigration when the phillips curve inverts. Regardless of existing housing shortages.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfjrJ5kSLD0

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Heres the cited reason by the conservatives on why he wants to do this, if you were curious:

https://www.conservative.ca/trudeaus-catch-and-release-policies-are-endangering-canadians/

Then heres the law itself, which cites racial injustice as to why it was needed:

https://www.canada.ca/en/department-justice/news/2021/12/mandatory-minimum-penalties-to-be-repealed.html

You can agree with that or not, as long as you realize theres a larger issue at play.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Well if you're mad about this he also decided not to fire the MP who wanted to ship a Canadian to China for breaking Chinese laws. Where he would likely face execution, as a Canadian tweeting truthful rhetoric in Canada that goes against Chinese propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

When you buy an ETF you have no choice but to invest in Brookfield.

Steven Guilbeault owns pipeline companies as well since its part of the Canadian pension, its an idiotic take.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If we displaced coal do the coal plants just reopen, or does some other country ship the oil via cargo ship, or what would you expect to happen?

view more: ‹ prev next ›