trilobite

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah right. Docker seems to have gained more ground than LXC if its the first time I come across it. I hadn't realised they were similar, especially after I discovered that people are running docker in LXC ...

 

Hi, got Proxmox installed. Now want to install some VMs but would like to use a simple setup rather than painfully going trough an install. I've read I could accomplish this via ansible. Are there ready playbooks you can hack? Presumably I would need to have Proxmox understand playbooks?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What i read here is concerning. Non that i was getting into the swing of drocker .... :-( Is LXC the future then?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ok, I hadn't realised that the helper script installs docker. I thought LXC was an alternative to docker.

Regarding the VM option, I did think of doing just that but read a lot about it using too many resources with frigate and LXC seems to be more efficient option when it comes to resources

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

OK, I should have been clearer. With "community LXC repository on github" I actually meant that I used the LXC scripts. It did go through a few questions at the start but nothing relating to storage and camera setup.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

That is brilliant. Thanks. I haven't read this all yet looks like what I need.

 

Just got my first security camera, a Hikvision multi focal 4MP. I got Proxmox up and running and installed Frigate through the community LXC repository on github. Most of the documentation is to first install Docker as LXC and then Frigate as a normal docker compose yml, where all the configuration is done. Now that I've skipped the docker bit, how do i config my camera on frigate? From reading the frigate website, i need access to config file. I also need to tell frigate to save all streaming on my Truenas that I've shared with Proxmox via a NFS share. Anyone have a similar setup? These LXC containers seem pretty cool as concept, as from what I understand, they're similar to a bare metal install except the host shares its kernel and they bring the convienence of containerisation. Basically, LXC and Docker are similar in concept but with Docker you have the benefit of compose and portainer which are universal whereas LXC is part of Proxmox. Is that a fair summary?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Immich and Radicale definitely recommended. I've still got paperless-ng and plan to move to paperless-ngx as soon as I find the time. I've also got firefly-iii which is a big revolution to how I manage personal finance. Even my 17 old son has got into it ... He couldn't understand where all his hard earnings were going.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Looks like I have two options for Proxmox + Frigate:

a) full VM via a QEMU VM that then has Frigate as app container (Frigate website is not recommending this approach from what I understand)

b) Virtual environment (VE) thgrough the "Proxmox Container Toolkit" where Frigate is as a system container (i.e. docker container directly in the Proxmox environment, which eliminates the VM overhead. See here: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#chapter_pct

Looks like someone has got it up and running in the PCT environment https://www.homeautomationguy.io/blog/running-frigate-on-proxmox

Also, I need to get my hands on a Micro desktop with a PCIe slot so that I can stick the Coral unit in it. Any thoughts for cheap solutions on eBay?

 

Hi, I want to get Frigate installed on DELL Optiplex 3020. Given its a Intel Gen4 i5, I suspect I would be asking too much if I installed it on a VM that is running on Proxmox? From the Frigate website "Frigate runs best with Docker installed on bare metal Debian-based distributions. For ideal performance, Frigate needs low overhead access to underlying hardware for the Coral and GPU devices. Running Frigate in a VM on top of Proxmox, ESXi, Virtualbox, etc. is not recommended though some users have had success with Proxmox.". Anyone had any luck getting it up and running on a VM?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm on the same wagon, trying to get a home surveilance system up and running. I too have settled on Frigate and probably Amcrest cameras (which models are recommended besides the one listed on Frigate website?). But a also want to install motion sensors in the house and door magnetic switches. Using openhab. What setup would you recommend in terms of hardware? And is there an Alarmo type setup in openhab?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ah yes, thanks for raising. I had forgotten. So we have three Foss contenders:

  • Frigate
  • Motioneye
  • Zoneminder

I've only tried ME about 6 years ago with RPi camera. It was alright but I'm sure things have moved on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Thankyou for taking the time to explain. I was in fact going to get one Loryta cameras recomended by the Frigate website ... If i can even find it in EU. Don't want to pay the premium import taxes πŸ˜‰

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Are you able to expand? What exactly did not impress you? Motioneye (which I briefly used 3-4 years ago with a dodge camera) and Frigate seem to be those that are used mostly as OOS solutions and hooked up to either OpenHab or HA.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Yip, I already have pfSense installed with an isolated virtual network just for my home automation.

 

Starting to think about setting up my home camera surveillance system and what to avoid making poor decisions, so need to tap into community experience ... you guys :-)

Frigate seems like the direction to take if I want to strike a good balance between cost, integration and reliability. Hardware is a key issues. I could install HA and Frigate on my VM running on my Truenas server but I feel I'm putting all my eggs in one basket so thinking of having a dedicated machine for HA + Frigate. The Frigate website advertises this little beasts with a Coral PCIe unit. That about 300€ if I'm lucky, but I could live with that.

For camera I definitely do not want chinese-call-home/cheap stuff. The Lorytas advertised on the Frigate website seem to be difficult to get hold of (are these not chinese btw?) in Europe so was wondering what other peoples experience is. Cameras need to be comparable to these Lorytas in terms of quality and functionality (no chinese, no call home, good image quality, good relibility, weather proof)

Keen to hear whether others have tried the hardware/setup recomended on the Frigate website and whether there are people out there that have actually got even better setups.

This guy is recommending that the Frigate unit is separate from the HA unit. I'm unlikely to have more than 5 cameras installed and it feels a bit overkill to have two separate machines?

 

I've been noticing over la last few years that is is becoming more and more difficult to login to accounts, whether a bank account, a membership account, sometimes even browsing websites for shopping, through my VPN server. Is this just my impression or is there something going on now whereby there are services that keep list of VPN servers that are then sold to backs so that these parties can keep out anyone from trying to login via a VPN. It feels like the general consensus is VPN=malicious rather than "VPN="this guy is just trying to protect his privacy". I use AIRVPN but was wondering if there are VPN services that are more sophisticate and try to circumvent these VPN server blocks? It becoming a real pain to the point I'm wondering what it the point of paying fro a VPN is I'm finding myself having to login through my ISP IP rather than my VPN IP.

 

I've noticed that with time, my homelab is growing and with this comes complexity and time required to maintain. A big challenge is keeping on top of updates of firmware and key components (router and NAS, with pfsense and Truenas Scale respectively). What area people doing to ensure they keep on top of their homelab?

 

I have LMS at its latest version (8.5.3) installed on a VM. I hadnΓ t updated for a while and so decided to do so. To my surprise, I learnt that Logitech Media Server is now called Lyrion Music Server. Has anyone migrated from one to the other in a non-painfull way? I did a quick search. There are some guides for Synology and QNAP servers but I was after a more generic guide for pure docker. Anyone come across any?

 

I recently update pfBlockerNG on my pfsense box and after login in several days after I have loads of messages saying: "pfBlockerNG ASN - To utilize the ASN functionality, you must register for a free IPinfo Account. Review IP Tab for more information." Once I register are they going to start collecting data every time pfSense querries their ASN database?

22
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I moved from next cloud to syncthing some months back. I had nextcloud as an app for Truenas scale. Several times after app dates, next cloud would stop running and would have to setup up everything again.

Syncthing is OK but 2 things annoy me:

A. I get huge amounts of conflict file generated that use up space

B. File sharing with family is complicated. I tried to setup a share account that everyone uses but as syncthing works with device ids, it refuses two accounts from the same machine. I share my Linux laptop with my wife. We each have our own linux account. I've got syncthing running but can't even get my wife's account to sync because I get errors that device I'd already exists.

I don't want to go back to next cloud just for file sharing. I don't generally like the idea of relying on one service for multiple objectives (calendar, file sharing, etc.).

Is there a way to get syncthing to do what I want?

 

I've been running VMs on some old DELL T110ii but realise that I've loaded it a bit too much so want to leave it doing the job of NAS with Truenas Scale and move all my VMs to Proxmox. The idea is that I would have two optiplex that provide redundancy. Truenas Scale has got me used to ZFS but clear may not be an option with Optiplex 3020 as ZFS is pointless with one SSD. Has anyone got some similar arrangement and has their VMs and containers running on these simple desktop machines? How are you managing high availability and resilience?

 

Hi folks, I've got a VM that is running my Firefly iii instance and Paperless instance as containers. A lot of work and time goes into managing these tools and I want to make sure I don't lose them. This is my setup:

Turenas Scale machine 1 -> VM1 - Docker containers. The VM sits on its own dataset in Truenas.

I replicate the dataset to Truenas Scale 2 one a week and this machine only goes on on Sunday to save power.

I Rsync the dataset to a 3rd machine where there is a hard disk that I store offsite.

I recognize that I could lose up to one week of work but that is nothing compared to the human hrs spent building those databases from scratch.

Apart from snapshotting e rsyncing every day, what else could I do to make this more resilient without increasing CAPEX and OPEX costs?

 

Hi, I have Immich installed as an app on TrueNAS-SCALE-22.12.4.2. I'm trying to get the Immich folder to share via NFS to my client so that I can rsync it across for back up purposes. While I seem to not be getting any problems mounting the dataset on the client (no showing any errors), the folder is showing empty. The Immich dataset belongs to root on Truenas and permissions are set as u(rwx), g(r-x), o(r-x). I thought that because "other" have read permission of the dataset, I should be able to at least read the contents of the dataset folder. This is all I need for backup purposes. Any thought? Clearly I can't start messing around with permissions or changing user of the Immich dataset or I risk Immich not working anymore.

view more: next β€Ί