Lower home values would be a popular policy to focus on, instead of trying to moralize while innocent people suffer.
toastmeister
joined 3 months ago
Sorry, at what time?
Housing prices only 10x income with highways built in 1960.
The money supply grows about 8% on average, if you believe that money can flow from an ever more abundant asset into an ever scarcer asset then its really just two pieces of a puzzle.
Housing was likely no different before 2008, a lack of supply relative to cheap debt kept prices elevated, it wasnt until housing completions were too high that it began to fail. Before then it was simply a liquidity sponge being used to create a windfall to ultimately increase aggregate demand, which is how our monetary system functions.
Then what, explain why we dont actually give the land back because nobody actually cares outside of virtue signaling?
Having a few people born biological males in your change room or gym class isnt going to ruin your life, theres nothing they can see there that they cant see on the internet.
What would be cool is if we funded it with taxes. Given we now spend more in interest on debt than we do our health transfers, its kind of silly to not fund a social program you want to keep in perpetuity.
Doomberg was saying Carney was going to run for election in order to push pipelines through Quebec for a while now, using a separation crisis to do so. All his predictions seem to be coming true.
Photoshops were a thing before AI. Nobody cares because its just a weird thing creepy do in private.
Do our soldiers have helmets yet? That could help to project our will.