toastmeister

I hate to laugh but you are right, that does seem to be happening. I just cant rationalize an answer that appeases everyone.

I just also feel that both side seems to be strawman'ing the other, so a discussion seems somewhat ridiculous every single time with no one agreeing on anything.

I'd argue the goal was to get Palantir more government data. As it was Palantir had a huge bureaucracy around data protection, now they have everything, and xAI will inevitably be bought by Palantir as a reward to Musk from Peter Thiel.

Nobody else in the future will be able to do the same, due to cyber security standards.

No it doesn't, just curious. I could see a scenario where they want no segregation based on sex/gender/race/age/etc.. since anyone can identify as they want.

Some people assume nefarious individuals would go into ladies change rooms, washrooms, or prisons.

Carney was talking about using AI to implement a type of DOGE system on top of the tax cuts, is this DOGE coming soon at least?

Surely we care about interest payments on our debt, and the lack of productivity its been creating in our economy.

Classic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsq_hsfH5_Q

There used to be a reserve requirement where this was partially true on a fractional basis, but they got rid of it if I'm not mistaken.

Musks end goal was DOGE, and to break down bureaucracy in order to feed Palantir the totality of government data.

He says affordable housing. Its attempting to manipulate the language, in their definition affordable housing is government rentals, not housing actually being affordable.