Banks have many safeguard to protect clients for example PCI DSS. On the other hand as far as I know this is a law requiring them to verify people and I don't think there is a standard for this. Every company will do its own thing. Highy regulated would require them to have some standard, and I don't see that.
themachinestops
joined 8 months ago
Banks are highly regulated so it is not surprising that they would be strict in this, reddit on the other hand has no business doing it.
It is not just that, I don't trust Persona security, if a malicious actor installed a silent program that monitors users and sends it to a command and control center they probably won't know for months or even years. Cyber security is very bad in most companies.
I don't mean anything by it I am just informing in case you didn't know. Thanks for the other suggestions, but they unfortunately request only and I don't have time to wait for a reply, they are useful for next time I am looking for a research though.
The nexus bot was removed because of copyright and the website and IPFS don't work, they are stuck on searching.
In the case they should have made it clearer in the terms, there are many companies that try to enforce them even if they seem unenforceable like Disney in the death case.
There is no excuse to put terms like this, Disney proved that even if they look unenforceable they might try to enforce them.
Just because people don't read the agreements and didn't know about it doesn't mean they should have put it. Destroy physical copies is a dump clause and isn't enforcible.
Of course that doesn't stop companies from trying to enforce unenforceable clauses example: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/08/16/politics/arbitration-signing-away-rights-disney-plus-wrongful-death-lawsuit
169
No, Ubisoft's EULA clause ordering you to destroy your games isn't new, nor is it unique
(www.thegamer.com)
Agreed, thankfully piracy and emulation keep the games alive.
30
No, Ubisoft's EULA clause ordering you to destroy your games isn't new, nor is it unique
(www.thegamer.com)
If you to Yandex, and search the same thing, the difference is obvious.
They removed comments and reviews yikes.
279
They don't want people to pirate, but this is the service they want people to pay for.
(thephrasemaker.com)
An example for highly regulated for me would be a periodic audit to insure security and compliance with security control. This law is honestly dangerous in regards to privacy and endangers miners not help them. There no safety guards whatsoever.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5208739
You are correct that this law is dangerous regardless lf implementation though.