termain

joined 1 year ago
[–] termain@programming.dev 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That seems really good? With a critical mass of manifest dread cards, at least.

[–] termain@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

Balanced Unburial Rites, not too shabby.

[–] termain@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

A signpost uncommon that really fits the set themes.

[–] termain@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

Clever with the name. Surveil in white is interesting.

[–] termain@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

Looks fun as a brawl commander.

[–] termain@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

Wow, now I want to try that. Alternatively, transmorgify the token :D

[–] termain@programming.dev 4 points 10 months ago

Well, I don't have trust issues...

Damnit, did you just diagnose me over the internet?

[–] termain@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I like it. Lots of good imagery.

[–] termain@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Really good point about the AI context. I really hadn't considered how it would leak over into potentially corroding support for fair use.

[–] termain@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Huh. Thanks for explaining. I certainly find that surprising, but I definitely don't have enough experience with this community to know the shape of its members' feelings on copyright or fair use.

Thanks.

[–] termain@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I'd imagine the opposite. I'd be astonished if many programmers who use Lemmy would disagree with Alsup's ruling that "So long as the specific code used to implement a method is different, anyone is free under the Copyright Act to write his or her own code to carry out exactly the same function or specification of any methods used in the Java API. It does not matter that the declaration or method header lines are identical."

[–] termain@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

...

I think you misread the tone of my comment. I can name one. And point out one more potential candidate. I'd say that supports your position.

Also, I'm not sure how that constitutes cherry-picking, as for me that particular word choice implies a lack of good-faith reasoning. Regardless, I greatly appreciate your tone and consideration as well as your thoughtful points. Good discussion!

view more: ‹ prev next ›