t0mri

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

For me, its responsiveness. It may be the lightest but still feel slow. Eg: xfce, its heavier but feels more responsive.

Man but the built ins for theming, gorgeous

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Thanks. I used testdisk

4
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/31633930

My disk was dos labelled (MBR). So I 'fdisk'-ed my disk and entered 'o' to convert it to GPT and wrote it to the disk. Now all the partitions are gone. I want those back. I care about the data rather than the partitions

 

My disk was dos labelled (MBR). So I 'fdisk'-ed my disk and entered 'o' to convert it to GPT and wrote it to the disk. Now all the partitions are gone. I want those back. I care about the data rather than the partitions

Edit 0:

Solution:

  • install testdisk
  • run testdisk
  • choose "Create" log
  • choose target disk. Eg: /dev/sda
  • Choose appropriate partition type. Mine was MBR and I chose "Intel" and select "analyze"
  • Now you'll see deleted partitions. Giveem appropriate flags like "*" for boot (efi partition) and "P" any other using space or arrow keys and press enter
  • choose "write" and press y on the prompt to write those found partitions to the disk.

Thanks guys for the help

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Where's zig?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I remember something called lapce too

Edit 0: https://github.com/lapce/lapce

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

=O may be this is it. Ill play with it to find it when get back home. But why are you calling "insane" thing. To me file attributes make sense

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

No thats how it works. It hasnt changed. But lemmy hit you with my experience. I have 'notes' Dir. I write a lot. So I want myself 'write' permission but 'delete'

 

F-ing up myself is part of my routine. I always rm files that I don't mean to (obviously not always but it happens). So I think it would be nice to have separate 'delete' permission. With that I could protect my files from accidental 'rm's. What's your opinion

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

finally! thank you

 

i have a sh script. i want libnotify to call that script instead of dunst or anything

thanks

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

could you take a look at the new image and share what you think?

16
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/20536177

+-----------------+
| . local server  |
+-.---------------+
< . >
< . >
< . >
< . >
< . >
+-.-----------------------+
| . serveo/localhost.run  |
+-.-----------------------+
< . >
< . >               +----------------------+
< . >               |   .   raw data       |
< . >               | < . > encrypted data |
< . >               +----------------------+
+-.----------+
| . clients  |
+------------+

hellow,

i wanna host things (nextcloud, bin, syncthing) myself but im under cg nat so i cant do it the regular way. i have to tunnel my way out. the only concern is that, the raw data is readable by the ssh server (ie. serveo/localhost.run), but i dont anyone elses eyes on my data

sorry for my broken english.


edit:


please clarify me.

if i setup a vpn which provides encryption on my local server, can i go like this

+------------------+
|   . local server |
+-< . >------------+
 << . >>
 << . >>
 << . >>
 << . >>
 << . >>
+-< . >----------------------+
| < . > serveo/localhost.run |
+-< . >----------------------+
 << . >>
 << . >>               +-------------------------------------+
 << . >>               |    .   raw data                     |
 << . >>               |  < . > vpn encrypted data           |
 << . >>               | << . >> vpn encrypted data over tls |
 << . >>               +-------------------------------------+
+-< . >-------+
|   . clients |
+-------------+

sorry i dont know how to express this in words


this is what i was trying to say. so the idea, is that okay?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

wait. please clarify me.

if i setup a vpn which provides encryption on my local server, can i go like this

+------------------+
|   . local server |
+-< . >------------+
 << . >>
 << . >>
 << . >>
 << . >>
 << . >>
+-< . >----------------------+
| < . > serveo/localhost.run |
+-< . >----------------------+
 << . >>
 << . >>               +-------------------------------------+
 << . >>               |    .   raw data                     |
 << . >>               |  < . > vpn encrypted data           |
 << . >>               | << . >> vpn encrypted data over tls |
 << . >>               +-------------------------------------+
+-< . >-------+
|   . clients |
+-------------+

sorry i dont know how to express this in words

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

thanks for both answers. the second option, one i cant afford.

i did some research, the first the answer is partilly correct ig. for example syncthing offers password protection (https://docs.syncthing.net/users/untrusted.html) and for the bin, it provides client side encryption (https://github.com/HemmeligOrg/Hemmelig.app?tab=readme-ov-file#features) which will protect me even over plain http connection ig. please correct me if im wrong

these are product specific feature, so generally, as you said, no is the answer ig. i wish nextcloud offers something like. thanks again

35
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
+-----------------+
| . local server  |
+-.---------------+
< . >
< . >
< . >
< . >
< . >
+-.-----------------------+
| . serveo/localhost.run  |
+-.-----------------------+
< . >
< . >               +----------------------+
< . >               |   .   raw data       |
< . >               | < . > encrypted data |
< . >               +----------------------+
+-.----------+
| . clients  |
+------------+

hellow,

i wanna host things (nextcloud, bin, syncthing) myself but im under cg nat so i cant do it the regular way. i have to tunnel my way out. the only concern is that, the raw data is readable by the ssh server (ie. serveo/localhost.run), but i dont anyone elses eyes on my data

sorry for my broken english.


edit:


please clarify me.

if i setup a vpn which provides encryption on my local server, can i go like this

+------------------+
|   . local server |
+-< . >------------+
 << . >>
 << . >>
 << . >>
 << . >>
 << . >>
+-< . >----------------------+
| < . > serveo/localhost.run |
+-< . >----------------------+
 << . >>
 << . >>               +-------------------------------------+
 << . >>               |    .   raw data                     |
 << . >>               |  < . > vpn encrypted data           |
 << . >>               | << . >> vpn encrypted data over tls |
 << . >>               +-------------------------------------+
+-< . >-------+
|   . clients |
+-------------+

sorry i dont know how to express this in words


this is what i was trying to say. so the idea, is that okay?

 
 

i want to share audio over network so that i can use my tv as a wireless speaker. so i chose obs studio to make a stream out of my system audio coz i had it installed already. i went to settings -> output (advanced) -> recording (custom) and set ffmpeg output to output to url and set the url to udp://192.168.43.87:8081 and set container format to mp3 just to get started. so to test things out i ran mpv udp://192.168.43.87:8081 on the same machine and it plays audio. but when i tried accessing it from my android phone with mpv client, it doesnt play the audio, it just shows black screen for while and return to main menu of mpv app. thanks in advance.


edit

iptables:

Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination         
ACCEPT     tcp  --  anywhere             anywhere            
ACCEPT     udp  --  anywhere             anywhere            

Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination         

Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination         

solution

I set the sender's IP address as output URL in obs studio, thats the issue. To fix this, set the receiver's IP address as output URL. Yeah you can't broadcast with this ig.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/17545833

im new to system programming, idk if thats the issuse. but according gcc, it can not find dbus/dbus-arch-deps.h and thats all i know. any idea about this issue?

 program
[I] tomri@artix ~ [1]> cat main.c
#include <dbus-1.0/dbus/dbus.h>

int main(void) { return 0; }
# error
[I] tomri@artix ~> gcc main.c
In file included from main.c:1:
/usr/include/dbus-1.0/dbus/dbus.h:29:10: fatal error: dbus/dbus-arch-deps.h: No such file or directory
   29 | #include <dbus/dbus-arch-deps.h>
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
[I] tomri@artix ~> ls -la /usr/include/dbus-1.0/dbus/
total 216
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root  4096 Jul  2 20:26 ./
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root  4096 Jun 15 21:36 ../
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  2809 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-address.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  3470 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-bus.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 27018 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-connection.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  2909 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-errors.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 22076 Jun  8  2023 dbus-glib-bindings.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  2575 Jun  8  2023 dbus-glib-lowlevel.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14766 Jun  8  2023 dbus-glib.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  8969 Jun  8  2023 dbus-gtype-specialized.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  1464 Jun  8  2023 dbus-gvalue-parse-variant.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  7246 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-macros.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  1961 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-memory.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15259 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-message.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  1810 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-misc.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  3809 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-pending-call.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 23956 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-protocol.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  5412 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-server.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  5392 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-shared.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  3047 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-signature.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  2359 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-syntax.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  8505 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-threads.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  4143 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-types.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  3961 Jan 14 06:17 dbus.h
[I] tomri@artix ~> 
# my system
[I] tomri@artix ~> uname --all
Linux artix 6.9.7-artix1-1 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri, 28 Jun 2024 18:11:28 +0000 x86_64 GNU/Linux
 

im new to system programming, idk if thats the issuse. but according gcc, it can not find dbus/dbus-arch-deps.h and thats all i know. any idea about this issue?

 program
[I] tomri@artix ~ [1]> cat main.c
#include <dbus-1.0/dbus/dbus.h>

int main(void) { return 0; }
# error
[I] tomri@artix ~> gcc main.c
In file included from main.c:1:
/usr/include/dbus-1.0/dbus/dbus.h:29:10: fatal error: dbus/dbus-arch-deps.h: No such file or directory
   29 | #include <dbus/dbus-arch-deps.h>
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
[I] tomri@artix ~> ls -la /usr/include/dbus-1.0/dbus/
total 216
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root  4096 Jul  2 20:26 ./
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root  4096 Jun 15 21:36 ../
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  2809 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-address.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  3470 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-bus.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 27018 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-connection.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  2909 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-errors.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 22076 Jun  8  2023 dbus-glib-bindings.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  2575 Jun  8  2023 dbus-glib-lowlevel.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14766 Jun  8  2023 dbus-glib.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  8969 Jun  8  2023 dbus-gtype-specialized.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  1464 Jun  8  2023 dbus-gvalue-parse-variant.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  7246 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-macros.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  1961 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-memory.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15259 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-message.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  1810 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-misc.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  3809 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-pending-call.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 23956 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-protocol.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  5412 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-server.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  5392 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-shared.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  3047 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-signature.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  2359 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-syntax.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  8505 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-threads.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  4143 Jan 14 06:17 dbus-types.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  3961 Jan 14 06:17 dbus.h
[I] tomri@artix ~> 
# my system
[I] tomri@artix ~> uname --all
Linux artix 6.9.7-artix1-1 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri, 28 Jun 2024 18:11:28 +0000 x86_64 GNU/Linux
 

i recently switched to connman and i need a tui. so i searched for some and got:

but i believe both are orphaned. so it there any tui for connman out there?

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/17385918

idk im having this issue for a long time. itd be nice to have this fixed.

thanks

view more: next ›