sycamores

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The voice to parliament isn't about race, it's about ensuring that the traditional owners have constitutional right to advise parliament.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I agree 100%

The voice to parliament isn't a privilege attributed to a race, it's a privilege for the traditional owners of the land.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This article didn't actually have any information about Americans being puzzled, only that once, in a different episode, someone didn't recognise a cricket bat.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's not about inequality. The problem is that currently as it stands there is no special status in the constitution for the voice of the traditional owners of a land on which sovereignty was never ceded. It's a permanent problem that the voice will address.