supamanc

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (9 children)

In England it's illigal to keep a squirrel in captivity, but it's also illigal to release a captured squirrel back into the wild, so the only option is to (humanely) kill the poor fucker.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Thanks for this!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Like I said, it's a shame there's no way to avoid playing into 'their' hands and giving them all that extra revenue.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I love how they say there are "tough decisions" to be made about benefits. You're going to cut benefits and cut taxes, same as you've been doing for the last 14 yrs, and any other time you had power. Why's it so tough? You should be really fucking good at it by now!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, there is a difference, but it's barely perceptible, therefore it makes no difference which one is picked. If you actually have a preference go with that one. Otherwise flip a coin.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Wait, there are other protocols?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Also, bones are supposed to be the sacrificial weak point, to protect the high value organs from shock damage. Having indestructible bones would lead to fucked up internal organs and brain damage.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

God damn you, that's all I can read now 😂

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Nah, we have already exploited everything that can be easily exploited. Look at the effort we need to get new oil or metal deposits. Humans 2.0 will struggle to build basic machinery.

view more: ‹ prev next ›