How well do the OpenLlama models perform against Llama2? AIUI the training data uses for OpenLlama is the same?
stsquad
joined 2 years ago
Is he? From the clip he seems a lot more interested in talking about the vape ban than comenting on his own diet.
I do have pipewire installed (Debian Bookworm) and I have followed this checklist.
It seems to be a Chrome thing. Firefox as you say can share (although it only shares my central screen). Chrome should offer to share specific apps or screens but currently can only share its own tabs.
I've been on Wayland for some time and pretty much everything works apart from screen sharing with my browser.
It looks like a lot of mappings need adding as most people come up as unknown:
EDIT updated with newer mappings.
Top changeset contributors by employer
(Unknown) 11190 (62.7%)
(None) 4280 (24.0%)
Huawei 862 (4.8%)
Ferrous Systems 630 (3.5%)
Academics (various) 563 (3.2%)
Red Hat 124 (0.7%)
Google 102 (0.6%)
Microsoft 59 (0.3%)
IBM 28 (0.2%)
Funky 11 (0.1%)
Top lines changed by employer
(Unknown) 1018418 (56.9%)
(None) 484385 (27.0%)
Academics (various) 118247 (6.6%)
Ferrous Systems 100533 (5.6%)
Huawei 45443 (2.5%)
Red Hat 16009 (0.9%)
Microsoft 3359 (0.2%)
Google 2844 (0.2%)
Funky 447 (0.0%)
IBM 388 (0.0%)
the top contributors over the last year were:
Developers with the most changesets
Michael Goulet 1027 (5.7%)
Nicholas Nethercote 789 (4.4%)
Ralf Jung 763 (4.3%)
Camille Gillot 727 (4.1%)
Lukas Wirth 640 (3.6%)
Guillaume Gomez 583 (3.3%)
bjorn3 550 (3.1%)
Oliver Scherer 470 (2.6%)
Michael Howell 293 (1.6%)
Waffle Lapkin 266 (1.5%)
Esteban Küber 251 (1.4%)
Zalathar 249 (1.4%)
lcnr 247 (1.4%)
y21 221 (1.2%)
Jynn Nelson 188 (1.1%)
Urgau 187 (1.0%)
Nilstrieb 170 (1.0%)
Centri3 169 (0.9%)
hamidreza kalbasi 164 (0.9%)
Pietro Albini 156 (0.9%)
Developers with the most changed lines
Laurențiu Nicola 163716 (9.1%)
Philipp Krones 118974 (6.6%)
Lukas Wirth 100948 (5.6%)
Camille Gillot 94829 (5.3%)
Oleksandr Babak 89625 (5.0%)
Michael Goulet 83965 (4.7%)
Oliver Scherer 39890 (2.2%)
Nicholas Nethercote 39484 (2.2%)
Ralf Jung 38113 (2.1%)
hamidreza kalbasi 34576 (1.9%)
Ben Kimock 33647 (1.9%)
Guillaume Gomez 30774 (1.7%)
bjorn3 29218 (1.6%)
Zalathar 26214 (1.5%)
Esteban Küber 24612 (1.4%)
Alex Macleod 23724 (1.3%)
y21 20447 (1.1%)
Centri3 20168 (1.1%)
Urgau 19964 (1.1%)
Michael Howell 19795 (1.1%)
So this row wasn't over something like a Hamas flag or something like that, just a patch showing the kids cultural heritage? You see kids with Welsh flags and dragon logos all the time here. I'm fairly sure I've seen some of the Ukrainian kids with yellow and blue on.
Sorry yes this was GCC, I can do the same for the rust repo if you want.
The gitdm scripts come from LWN who do a regular "who writes the kernel" report but can work on any git repo.
You can be fairly certain that patches coming from a corporate domain are paid for their time. You can add extra metadata to track people who use personal or org addresses if they confirm it's a paid gig. The project I work on most is about 75% paid contributors with hobbyists and academics making up the rest. The good unpaid contributors can often get hired if they want to be.
I added gitdm stats awhile back although the mappings could certainly do with some clean-up. For the last year of activity the stats are:
Top changeset contributors by employer
Red Hat 1807 (17.6%)
[email protected] 814 (7.9%)
AdaCore 795 (7.8%)
ARM 778 (7.6%)
SUSE 649 (6.3%)
Intel 475 (4.6%)
Code Sourcery 366 (3.6%)
Automatic Admin 360 (3.5%)
[email protected] 347 (3.4%)
IBM 201 (2.0%)
Top lines changed by employer
[email protected] 1392979 (25.9%)
SiFive 1236220 (23.0%)
Code Sourcery 676611 (12.6%)
Red Hat 416369 (7.8%)
ARM 309116 (5.8%)
[email protected] 300270 (5.6%)
[email protected] 174876 (3.3%)
Automatic Admin 160200 (3.0%)
Intel 86657 (1.6%)
AdaCore 60414 (1.1%)
That's a hell of an assumption. I know a number of Arm GCC and LLVM hackers who are all employed by various companies including Arm themselves. It's in chip designers/manufacturers interest to have good GCC support for their architecture.
There are still some things meson can't do which we need the configure script for. The meson upstream are slowly working through our feature requests 😉
Nice write up. I have 24bit terminals running most places but still have a few stubborn systems that get confused with the nesting of tmux. I shall follow the tips in the article and attempt to diagnose what's going wrong tomorrow.