stingpie

Sorry for being off-topic, but I don't think I understand anarchism as a political philosophy. Isn't anarchism the absence of imposed rules? Communal resources seems to go against that, (it does make sense that the players get to divvy it up, though) and being cursed by the gods feels like a more theocratic thing than anarchist. Im not trying to be rude or anything, I just like to pick people's brains about this stuff.

If they had writing during the paleolithic era, and had suddenly became sentient over the course of a few decades to a century(I might be misremembering some of your other posts) I think the Theophany might not be the first instance of a guiding hand in the yinrih's evolution.

Also, if the yinrih went from paleolithic to spaceflight in the space of 5 millennia, I feel like their culture would be massively underdeveloped. Would art have developed in such a short time, or would design be purely functional? For humans, the paleolithic age started 3 million years ago, and the neolithic age (development of agriculture and the first time humans had any real free time) 11 thousand years ago. (Not to mention the earliest instruments date back to 38,000 BC.) So if the yinrih was merely 5 millennia old, and had such a focus on spaceflight, I think they would probably be in awe of human music theory.

After reading a lot of comments in this thread, I'm not sure I know what spaghetti code is. I thought spaghetti code was when the order of execution was obfuscated due to excessive jumps and GOTOs. But a lot of people are citing languages without those as examples of spaghetti code. Is this just a classic "I don't like this programming language, and I don't know much about it." Or is there something I'm missing?

You could do this in basic ASCII, with only three defines. replace "_ " with "{", replace "_;" with "}", and "_" with nothing. If your compiler processes macros in the correct order, it will become valid code. (You would use semicolons as the vertical lines)

You always have to package good people with secret shames so suspicious players can gauge how good or evil they are. What people feel they need to hide is a good measure of what they consider acceptable. For example, a lawful good character could be ashamed by ignoring a person asking for help, but a lawful evil character might be ashamed that they indiscriminately murdered adults & children.

I would be so much more positive about this if you linked the actual source, not just an article that regurgitates everything word for word. Also, why is this article on 'indian defense review?' India and Pakistan nearly had a nuclear war this morning.

There's a streamer called vedal[some numbers here, I forgot] that might be autistic—I'm not sure if he is, but he's certainly shy and has difficulty expressing emotion. He made an AI vtuber thing called 'neuro-sama' it's only really interesting because it's an LLM in a real-time scenario.

Who'd be the first?

Obligatory wizard scene

Are you being sarcastic? I can't tell.

This is a good first step, but power64 and itanium are antiquated ISAs, and should be removed. The only processor that is capable of all the advanced features of plan9 is the TMS99105, and working on any other architecture is a waste of time and effort.

I typically work backwards from observations of people and extend my conclusions to a logical extreme. Like, people want smart conversational AI that can feel, etc. But they also want AI that can take over the worst jobs and prevent people from suffering through them (like robots displacing child slave cobalt miners). Taking this to it's logical conclusion, we get a world where people design conscious robots, and force them into slavery in order to displace human slavery.