squaresinger

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

That's what happens if you don't have public health care.

A small insurer or even an uninsured person cannot bargain with large pharma companies. If they try to, the pharma company will just not sell the product, because it's more expensive for them to lower the prices for everyone compared to losing one small customer.

But if your whole country's health system bargains at once, it can get much better deals, because not taking a deal means for the pharma company that they'll lose access to millions of potential customers.

That's why for example in Europe Insulin costs about 10% per dose compared to what people in the USA have to pay.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

It's just a matter of how much they want to invest in what.

In many cases toll roads mean that the government didn't want to/wasn't able to invest in building a road, so they let a private for-profit company do it for "free" (meaning without tax money) and that company then recoups their investment using toll.

Some times toll roads are used to steer traffic. Some cities for example have a city toll that's meant to discourage commuters from using their car to get into the city and instead get them to use public transport.

The first case means the country doesn't raise enough tax, wastes too much tax money or has other priorities than road infrastructure.

The second case is totally valid since it uses tax to discourage unwanted behaviour.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

Let me google that for you: https://frontiergroup.org/resources/who-pays-roads/

There are literally tens of thousands of articles like this one.

TLDR:

  • less than 50% of car infrastructure cost is paid for by driving related taxes
  • An average of $1100 in general tax per household per year is used to subsidise driving
  • Car infrastructure receives more subsidies from general tax than transit, passenger rail, cycling and pedestrian programs combined.

No, drivers pull their own weight in regards to car related taxes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

A word with a very similar spelling to a youth word from almost 100 years ago with almost the same meaning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66km3m_UE_k

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago

If you design your testing set well enough and then don't care about the accuracy of the output, then it's not hard to get that kind of accuracy even without a brain scanner.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I'm agreeing and expouning.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

GUI and CLI are tools, both with separate advantages and disadvantages.

CLI let's you chain different commands easily to create functionality that originally wasn't there. It's really flexible, but it's also very non-obvious. Even after more than a decade of Linux usage, I still find new commands I have never heard of that do exactly what I wanted to do for a while.

GUI is great for visual stuff (nobody in their right mind would do video/audio/image editing on CLI). It's also very obvious/explorable, so you tend to find functionality much quicker. That makes it great for any tools that you don't use on a daily basis. And GUIs can utilise the bandwidth of human visual input much better, which makes them better whenever large amounts of data are presented.

Neither CLI nor GUI are better, they just have different use cases where they are better.

And it annoys me a lot that people don't get that.

When you say "X is better than Y", you always need to state for what it is better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I agree with your statement, but encoding it in binary is annoying as hell

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Could have just used propper capitalization of the acronym. Would have been equally clear.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

And if you want both piracy and the convenience of Steam, there are always key resellers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah, a bit farther down he posted that anyone who is against guns hates men (even if they themselves are men as well).

So apparently, his whole ego and masculinity are built on himself shooting guns.

It's sad, really.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Please read your own statistics. The first graph you showed forgot to add gun suicides to the gun violence number. And removing ~2% of deaths just by changing some simple laws is huge. It would be better than completely curing AIDS.

Regarding your second screenshot: The guy before was talking about how the USA is the most dangerous western country. So you post a screenshot which puts the USA behind some non-western country.

If you look at the fitting article on Wikipedia

You see that the USA is currently on place 9, behind only South/Middle American and Carribian countries.

The next kinda western country is Serbia on place 22.

view more: ‹ prev next ›