spiffmeister

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Advance has already said they will be targeting the Greens this election, and given both parties opposed the "truth in political advertising" bill you can bet it's going to be a shitshow of misinfo.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Borderline corrupt behavior by the corruption commissioner okay because he didn't mean it. Ok.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Isn't this a clear demonstration of corruption by the ALP?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fair call. It would be nice if QLD had an upper house to hopefully block proposals like this.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not massively surprising that Greens would be replaced with independents. They had the smaller primary vote share afaik, and Thomas Emmerson having Pococks support probably makes a difference.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It's not clear to me that moving to optional is what he means:

“Preferences should not be a thing in Queensland elections, and it won’t be if government changes,” he said.

This quote suggests to me he wants to get rid of preferences all together.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

Definitely not something a corrupt person would say.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If they're "permitted to year shorts" why not just skip the skirt and let them wear shorts?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Even with a 10% pay cut the VC will be remunerated over $1,000,000 per year, even despite the university's poor financial performance.

Afaik the ANU VC earns about $650k (here). Not that this isn't probably 6-8x what most others in the university earn.

Pretty much agree with everything you say though. I'm about to graduate from ANU and I'm glad to be leaving tbh.

I would just add that, while the unis are managed poorly, the cuts to the sector by successive governments can't be excused.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Because if no one reviews the articles then anyone could publish junk. In highly technical fields the only people qualified to tell if something is BS science are the experts in the field, so they review and make sure the article has some merit.

That's not to say the reviewing process is perfect, but it does at least help to filter some amount of bs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

It really can't be that hard to be better than Dutton. Truly astounding.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Maybe they have some condition which compels them to blow up medical centres, and eventually they'll be firing missiles at hospitals in Europe because there's none left in the region

view more: ‹ prev next ›