spauldo

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I'm sure the low flow toilets thing was written for him. Cheap low flow toilets have problems flushing. Mid-range and high end ones - i.e. any his ass has actually touched - flush just fine.

That's why you never go for the cheap option when toilet shopping. It's not worth it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Wayland wasn't the first attempt at replacing X. It has made more traction than any other attempt, though. There's no real hurry - it's not like X eats your babies and runs over your dog.

As far as robustness goes, that's mostly the driver. I've yet to see a bulletproof display system, commercial or non-commercial. If you cut out driver issues, X is on par with or more stable than other systems. It had better be, given that it's had decades of bug fixes with few new features to cause new bugs.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago

Instead of Satanic rituals, it's improvisation and arithmetic.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (9 children)

You're listening to loud asshats and assuming they're the majority. They're not.

One day Wayland will reach a tipping point where it will replace X. Until then, most users will just stick with whatever their distro installs. Most people don't care one way or another.

As for me, I'm probably gonna to stick with X until I have no choice because I actually use the network features that Wayland isn't replacing. That doesn't mean I hate Wayland - I've never used it - it just means it's not the best software for me at this time. Most people never do anything with X that Wayland can't do and won't notice when it becomes the default.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago

Naw, we just buy ones where the lattice is diagonal.

In other words, we install X Windows.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago

People do tend to become more (small c) conservative as they grow older for a multitude of reasons. It makes sense - you've spent years accomplishing various goals and establishing a place for yourself. You've got more to lose, so you resist change.

But what I'm talking about is the loss of novelty. You stop caring about every new fad, every new piece of tech, every new movement. Life loses the magical quality it holds for the young. You focus more on the things you think are important, while the rest becomes background noise.

You don't really notice at first. Then one day you look up and everything is different. Young people are talking about stuff you've never heard of and doing things that seem silly and inconsequential. New ways of doing things become common, and you feel stupid because you haven't learned them. Instead of being more knowledgeable over time, you find yourself having to relearn new ways of doing things you mastered years ago.

Some people try their hardest to keep up, even though it's harder every year. Some people shrug and accept it, content to let the young find their own way. Some complain endlessly and try to fight against change, insisting that the way of life they've led is the only proper way to live.

This happens to almost everyone. There are a few who manage to hold on to that spark of curiosity and wonder into old age, but they're few and far between. You probably aren't one of them. I know I'm not.

So what kind of person will you become?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Sometimes I tell myself, "this is not my beautiful stapler!"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Ah, that's more what I expect. Of course, most of his readership will look at that top book and try to remember if Karl was the one with the horn that didn't talk.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Ben is losing his touch if he thinks his target audience knows what a "Maoist" is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

His later stuff is quite a bit harder. Alice gets more metal as he ages.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Hah! Old age will have surprises for you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't see the implications of immortality or lack of work ethic in the small amount of the article you can see without a Forbes subscription. But regardless, remember Forbes' target readership: business executives, investors, and people in the finance industry. Those people aren't considered bastions of morality by the populace at large anyway.

Also remember that Forbes readers are more likely to work from home than the general public. They aren't going to try to villify their reader base.

Forbes is all about business. Deodorant sales were down during lockdown and are recovering now that people are returning to work. That's noteworthy if you own stock in Proctor & Gamble, for instance, and makes for an interesting bit of information even if you don't. It makes me wonder about other industries affected by the return to work.

But if you really want to read it that way, go ahead. Just don't be surprised if you have to repeatedly explain the extremely tenuous connection between this article and western oppression.

view more: ‹ prev next ›